This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robison-Cox, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robison-Cox, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, D. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Robison-Cox, J. F.
Right arrow Articles by Ward, D. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 04 1995, 1240-1245, Vol 61, No. 4
Copyright © 1995, American Society for Microbiology

Evaluation of nearest-neighbor methods for detection of chimeric small- subunit rRNA sequences

JF Robison-Cox, MM Bateson and DM Ward
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman 59717, USA.

Detection of chimeric artifacts formed when PCR is used to retrieve naturally occurring small-subunit (SSU) rRNA sequences may rely on demonstrating that different sequence domains have different phylogenetic affiliations. We evaluated the CHECK_CHIMERA method of the Ribosomal Database Project and another method which we developed, both based on determining nearest neighbors of different sequence domains, for their ability to discern artificially generated SSU rRNA chimeras from authentic Ribosomal Database Project sequences. The reliability of both methods decreases when the parental sequences which contribute to chimera formation are more than 82 to 84% similar. Detection is also complicated by the occurrence of authentic SSU rRNA sequences that behave like chimeras. We developed a naive statistical test based on CHECK_CHIMERA output and used it to evaluate previously reported SSU rRNA chimeras. Application of this test also suggests that chimeras might be formed by retrieving SSU rRNAs as cDNA. The amount of uncertainty associated with nearest-neighbor analyses indicates that such tests alone are insufficient and that better methods are needed.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Jeon, S.-O., Bunge, J., Stoeck, T., Barger, K. J.-A., Hong, S.-H., Epstein, S. S. (2006). Synthetic statistical approach reveals a high degree of richness of microbial eukaryotes in an anoxic water column.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 6578-6583 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Behnke, A., Bunge, J., Barger, K., Breiner, H.-W., Alla, V., Stoeck, T. (2006). Microeukaryote Community Patterns along an O2/H2S Gradient in a Supersulfidic Anoxic Fjord (Framvaren, Norway).. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 3626-3636 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ashelford, K. E., Chuzhanova, N. A., Fry, J. C., Jones, A. J., Weightman, A. J. (2005). At Least 1 in 20 16S rRNA Sequence Records Currently Held in Public Repositories Is Estimated To Contain Substantial Anomalies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 7724-7736 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Acinas, S. G., Sarma-Rupavtarm, R., Klepac-Ceraj, V., Polz, M. F. (2005). PCR-Induced Sequence Artifacts and Bias: Insights from Comparison of Two 16S rRNA Clone Libraries Constructed from the Same Sample. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 8966-8969 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • von der Heyden, S., Cavalier-Smith, T. (2005). Culturing and environmental DNA sequencing uncover hidden kinetoplastid biodiversity and a major marine clade within ancestrally freshwater Neobodo designis. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55: 2605-2621 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dick, L. K., Bernhard, A. E., Brodeur, T. J., Santo Domingo, J. W., Simpson, J. M., Walters, S. P., Field, K. G. (2005). Host Distributions of Uncultivated Fecal Bacteroidales Bacteria Reveal Genetic Markers for Fecal Source Identification. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 3184-3191 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gonzalez, J. M., Zimmermann, J., Saiz-Jimenez, C. (2005). Evaluating putative chimeric sequences from PCR-amplified products. Bioinformatics 21: 333-337 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Stoeck, T., Taylor, G. T., Epstein, S. S. (2003). Novel Eukaryotes from the Permanently Anoxic Cariaco Basin (Caribbean Sea). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 5656-5663 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Stoeck, T., Epstein, S. (2003). Novel Eukaryotic Lineages Inferred from Small-Subunit rRNA Analyses of Oxygen-Depleted Marine Environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 2657-2663 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hugenholtz, P., Huber, T. (2003). Chimeric 16S rDNA sequences of diverse origin are accumulating in the public databases. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 53: 289-293 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Short, S. M., Suttle, C. A. (2002). Sequence Analysis of Marine Virus Communities Reveals that Groups of Related Algal Viruses Are Widely Distributed in Nature. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 1290-1296 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dang, H., Lovell, C. R. (2000). Bacterial Primary Colonization and Early Succession on Surfaces in Marine Waters as Determined by Amplified rRNA Gene Restriction Analysis and Sequence Analysis of 16S rRNA Genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 467-475 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Riemann, L., Steward, G. F., Azam, F. (2000). Dynamics of Bacterial Community Composition and Activity during a Mesocosm Diatom Bloom. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 578-587 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ward, D. M., Ferris, M. J., Nold, S. C., Bateson, M. M. (1998). A Natural View of Microbial Biodiversity within Hot Spring Cyanobacterial Mat Communities. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62: 1353-1370 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rappé, M. S., Suzuki, M. T., Vergin, K. L., Giovannoni, S. J. (1998). Phylogenetic Diversity of Ultraplankton Plastid Small-Subunit rRNA Genes Recovered in Environmental Nucleic Acid Samples from the Pacific and Atlantic Coasts of the United States. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 294-303 [Abstract] [Full Text]