AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schnell, S.
Right arrow Articles by King, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schnell, S.
Right arrow Articles by King, G. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schnell, S.
Right arrow Articles by King, G. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Sep 1996, 3203-3209, Vol 62, No. 9
Copyright © 1996, American Society for Microbiology

Responses of Methanotrophic Activity in Soils and Cultures to Water Stress

S Schnell and GM King
Darling Marine Center, University of Maine, Walpole, Maine 04573

Diffusive gas transport at high water contents and physiological water stress at low water contents limited atmospheric methane consumption rates during experimental manipulations of soil water content and water potential. Maximum rates of atmospheric methane consumption occurred at a soil water content of 25% (grams per gram [dry weight]) and a water potential of about -0.2 MPa. In contrast, uptake rates were highest at a water content of 38% and a water potential of -0.03 MPa when methane was initially present at 200 ppm. Uptake rates of atmospheric and elevated methane decreased when water potentials were reduced by adding either ionic or nonionic solutes to soils with a fixed water content. Uptake rates during these manipulations were lower when sodium chloride or potassium chloride was used to adjust water potential rather than sucrose. The response of methane consumption by soils to water potential was somewhat less pronounced than the response of methanotrophic cultures (e.g., Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b, Methylomonas rubra [= M. methanica], an isolate from a freshwater peat, and an isolate from an intertidal marine mudflat). However, unlike soils, methanotrophic cultures exhibited a stronger adverse response to nonionic solutes than to sodium chloride.


This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.