This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ibeas, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Jimenez, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ibeas, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Jimenez, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ibeas, J. I.
Right arrow Articles by Jimenez, J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 01 1997, 7-12, Vol 63, No. 1
Copyright © 1997, American Society for Microbiology

Mitochondrial DNA loss caused by ethanol in Saccharomyces flor yeasts

JI Ibeas and J Jimenez
Departamento de Genetica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Malaga, Spain.

Saccharomyces flor yeasts proliferate at the surface of sherry wine, which contains over 15% (vol) ethanol. Since ethanol is a powerful inducer of respiration-deficient mutants, this alcohol has been proposed to be the source of the high diversity found in the mitochondrial genomes of flor yeasts and other wine yeasts. Southern blot analysis suggests that mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) polymorphic changes are due to minor lesions in the mitochondrial genome. As determined in this work by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, restriction analysis, and Southern blot analysis, ethanol-induced petite mutants completely lack mtDNA (rho zero). Ethanol-induced changes in the mitochondrial genome that could explain the observed mtDNA polymorphism in flor yeasts were not found. The transfer of two different mtDNA variants from flor yeasts to a laboratory strain conferred in both cases an increase in ethanol tolerance in the recipient strain, suggesting that mtDNAs are probably subjected to positive selection pressure concerning their ability to confer ethanol tolerance.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hu, X. H., Wang, M. H., Tan, T., Li, J. R., Yang, H., Leach, L., Zhang, R. M., Luo, Z. W. (2007). Genetic Dissection of Ethanol Tolerance in the Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 175: 1479-1487 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fidalgo, M., Barrales, R. R., Ibeas, J. I., Jimenez, J. (2006). Adaptive evolution by mutations in the FLO11 gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 11228-11233 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • You, K. M., Rosenfield, C.-L., Knipple, D. C. (2003). Ethanol Tolerance in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Dependent on Cellular Oleic Acid Content. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 1499-1503 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Nadal, D., Carro, D., Fernández-Larrea, J., Piña, B. (1999). Analysis and Dynamics of the Chromosomal Complements of Wild Sparkling-Wine Yeast Strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 1688-1695 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»