AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Biosca, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Biosca, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Biosca, E. G.
Right arrow Articles by Pedersen, K.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Apr 1997, 1460-1466, Vol 63, No. 4
Copyright © 1997, American Society for Microbiology

Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Vibrio vulnificus: proposal for the substitution of the subspecific taxon biotype for serovar

EG Biosca, C Amaro, JL Larsen and K Pedersen
Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Frederiksberg, Denmark.

The classification of Vibrio vulnificus strains into two biotypes has been maintained on the basis of phenotypic properties and eel virulence. Biotype 2 is virulent for eels, negative for the indole reaction, and serologically homogeneous (serogroup E), whereas strains of biotype 1 are avirulent, indole positive, and serologically heterogeneous. In the present study, we phenotypically and genotypically characterized 21 V. vulnificus isolates, recovered mainly from northern Europe, by comparing them with reference strains of both biotypes to look for new isolates of biotype 2. The results of this work revealed that the majority of isolates virulent for eels presented phenotypic traits previously considered characteristics of biotype 2 and specific ribotypes with HindIII. However, among the new isolates we found (i) a serogroup E strain virulent for eels but indole positive and (ii) one isolate not belonging to serogroup E but pathogenic for eels. Since no biochemical test for specific serogroup can with certainty be associated with eel virulence, we propose to classify V. vulnificus strains into serovars instead of biotypes. Thus, we suggest serovar E as the denomination of those strains previously classified as biotype 2. Finally, the occurrence of serogroup E in eels cultured in Norway and Sweden, as well as from human infections and shrimp, has been demonstrated.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.