This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fries, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tiedje, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fries, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tiedje, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fries, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Tiedje, J. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Apr 1997, 1515-1522, Vol 63, No. 4
Copyright © 1997, American Society for Microbiology

Microbial Succession during a Field Evaluation of Phenol and Toluene as the Primary Substrates for Trichloroethene Cometabolism

MR Fries, GD Hopkins, PL Mccarty, LJ Forney and JM Tiedje
Center for Microbial Ecology and Departments of Crop and Soil Sciences and of Microbiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, and Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

Microbial community composition and succession were studied in an aquifer that was amended with phenol, toluene, and chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons to evaluate the effectiveness of these aromatic substrates for stimulating trichloroethene (TCE) bioremediation. Samples were taken after the previous year's field studies, which used phenol as the primary substrate, and after three successive monthly treatments of phenol plus 1,1-dichloroethene (1,1-DCE) plus TCE, phenol plus TCE, and toluene plus TCE. Dominant eubacteria in the community were assessed after each of the four treatments by characterizing isolates from the most dilute most-probable-number tubes and by extracting DNA from aquifer samples. The succession of dominant phenol- and toluene-degrading strains was evaluated by genomic fingerprinting, cellular fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) analysis, and amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA). 1,1-DCE was found to drastically reduce microbial growth and species richness, which corresponded to the reduction in bioremediation effectiveness noted previously for this treatment (G. D. Hopkins and P. L. McCarty, Environ. Sci. Technol. 29:1628-1637, 1995). Only a few gram-positive isolates could be obtained after treatment with 1,1-DCE, and these were not seen after any other treatments. Microbial densities returned to their original levels following the subsequent phenol-TCE treatment, but the original species richness was not restored until after the subsequent toluene-TCE treatment. Genomic fingerprinting and FAME analysis indicated that six of the seven originally dominant microbial groups were still dominant after the last treatment, indicating that the community is quite resilient to toxic disturbance by 1,1-DCE. FAME analysis indicated that six microbial taxa were dominant: three members of the (beta) subclass of the class Proteobacteria (Comamonas-Variovorax, Azoarcus, and Burkholderia) and three gram-positive groups (Bacillus, Nocardia, and an unidentified group). ARDRA revealed that the dominant community members were stable during the three nontoxic treatments and that virtually all of the bands could be accounted for by isolates from five of the dominant taxa, indicating that the isolation protocol used likely recovered most of the dominant members of this community.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Parales, R. E., Bruce, N. C., Schmid, A., Wackett, L. P. (2002). Biodegradation, Biotransformation, and Biocatalysis (B3). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 4699-4709 [Full Text]  
  • Schutter, M. E., Dick, R. P. (2000). Comparison of Fatty Acid Methyl Ester (FAME) Methods for Characterizing Microbial Communities. Soil Sci. 64: 1659-1668 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Whiteley, A. S., Bailey, M. J. (2000). Bacterial Community Structure and Physiological State within an Industrial Phenol Bioremediation System. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 2400-2407 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Ritchie, N. J., Schutter, M. E., Dick, R. P., Myrold, D. D. (2000). Use of Length Heterogeneity PCR and Fatty Acid Methyl Ester Profiles To Characterize Microbial Communities in Soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 1668-1675 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Fernández, A., Huang, S., Seston, S., Xing, J., Hickey, R., Criddle, C., Tiedje, J. (1999). How Stable Is Stable? Function versus Community Composition. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 3697-3704 [Abstract] [Full Text]