This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Visser, J. M. Articles by Kuenen, J. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Visser, J. M. Articles by Kuenen, J. G. Agricola Articles by Visser, J. M. Articles by Kuenen, J. G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Appl. Environ. Microbiol., Jun 1997, 2300-2305, Vol 63, No. 6
Copyright © 1997, American Society for Microbiology

Sulfur Production by Obligately Chemolithoautotrophic Thiobacillus Species

JM Visser, LA Robertson, HW Van Verseveld and JG Kuenen
Department of Microbiology and Enzymology, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BC Delft, and Biocentrum Amsterdam, Department of Microbiology, Vrije Universiteit, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Transient-state experiments with the obligately autotrophic Thiobacillus sp. strain W5 revealed that sulfide oxidation proceeds in two physiological phases, (i) the sulfate-producing phase and (ii) the sulfur- and sulfate-producing phase, after which sulfide toxicity occurs. Specific sulfur-producing characteristics were independent of the growth rate. Sulfur formation was shown to occur when the maximum oxidative capacity of the culture was approached. In order to be able to oxidize increasing amounts of sulfide, the organism has to convert part of the sulfide to sulfur (HS(sup-)(symbl)S(sup0) + H(sup+) + 2e(sup-)) instead of sulfate (HS(sup-) + 4H(inf2)O(symbl)SO(inf4)(sup2-) + 9 H(sup+) + 8e(sup-)), thereby keeping the electron flux constant. Measurements of the in vivo degree of reduction of the cytochrome pool as a function of increasing sulfide supply suggested a redox-related down-regulation of the sulfur oxidation rate. Comparison of the sulfur-producing properties of Thiobacillus sp. strain W5 and Thiobacillus neapolitanus showed that the former has twice the maximum specific sulfide-oxidizing capacity of the latter (3.6 versus 1.9 (mu)mol/mg of protein/min). Their maximum specific oxygen uptake rates were very similar. Significant mechanistic differences in sulfur production between the high-sulfur-producing Thiobacillus sp. strain W5 and the moderate-sulfur-producing species T. neapolitanus were not observed. The limited sulfide-oxidizing capacity of T. neapolitanus appears to be the reason that it can convert only 50% of the incoming sulfide to elemental sulfur.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Okabe, S., Ito, T., Sugita, K., Satoh, H. (2005). Succession of Internal Sulfur Cycles and Sulfur-Oxidizing Bacterial Communities in Microaerophilic Wastewater Biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 2520-2529 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Cooper, R. M., Williams, J. S. (2004). Elemental sulphur as an induced antifungal substance in plant defence. J Exp Bot 55: 1947-1953 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Sorokin, D. Yu., Tourova, T. P., Antipov, A. N., Muyzer, G., Kuenen, J. G. (2004). Anaerobic growth of the haloalkaliphilic denitrifying sulfur-oxidizing bacterium Thialkalivibrio thiocyanodenitrificans sp. nov. with thiocyanate. Microbiology 150: 2435-2442 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Williams, J. S., Hall, S. A., Hawkesford, M. J., Beale, M. H., Cooper, R. M. (2002). Elemental Sulfur and Thiol Accumulation in Tomato and Defense against a Fungal Vascular Pathogen. Plant Physiol. 128: 150-159 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gevertz, D., Telang, A. J., Voordouw, G., Jenneman, G. E. (2000). Isolation and Characterization of Strains CVO and FWKO B, Two Novel Nitrate-Reducing, Sulfide-Oxidizing Bacteria Isolated from Oil Field Brine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 2491-2501 [Abstract] [Full Text]