Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Appl Environ Microbiol, January 1998, p. 197-202, Vol. 64, No. 1
Laboratoire d'Hygiène et de Recherche
en Santé Publique,
Received 17 June 1997/Accepted 28 October 1997
The development of bacterial communities in drinking water
distribution systems leads to a food chain which supports the growth of
macroorganisms incompatible with water quality requirements and
esthetics. Nevertheless, very few studies have examined the microbial
communities in drinking water distribution systems and their trophic
relationships. This study was done to quantify the microbial
communities (especially bacteria and protozoa) and obtain direct and
indirect proof of protozoan feeding on bacteria in two distribution
networks, one of GAC water (i.e., water filtered on granular activated
carbon) and the other of nanofiltered water. The nanofiltered
water-supplied network contained no organisms larger than bacteria,
either in the water phase (on average, 5 × 107
bacterial cells liter
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Protozoan Bacterivory and Escherichia
coli Survival in Drinking Water Distribution Systems
CNRS 7564,
1) or in the biofilm (on average,
7 × 106 bacterial cells cm
2). No
protozoa were detected in the whole nanofiltered water-supplied network
(water plus biofilm). In contrast, the GAC water-supplied network
contained bacteria (on average, 3 × 108 cells
liter
1 in water and 4 × 107 cells
cm
2 in biofilm) and protozoa (on average, 105
cells liter
1 in water and 103 cells
cm
2 in biofilm). The water contained mostly flagellates
(93%), ciliates (1.8%), thecamoebae (1.6%), and naked amoebae
(1.1%). The biofilm had only ciliates (52%) and thecamoebae (48%).
Only the ciliates at the solid-liquid interface of the GAC
water-supplied network had a measurable grazing activity in laboratory
test (estimated at 2 bacteria per ciliate per h). Protozoan ingestion
of bacteria was indirectly shown by adding Escherichia coli
to the experimental distribution systems. Unexpectedly, E. coli was lost from the GAC water-supplied network more rapidly
than from the nanofiltered water-supplied network, perhaps because of
the grazing activity of protozoa in GAC water but not in nanofiltered
water. Thus, the GAC water-supplied network contained a functional
ecosystem with well-established and structured microbial communities,
while the nanofiltered water-supplied system did not. The presence of protozoa in drinking water distribution systems must not be neglected because these populations may regulate the autochthonous and
allochthonous bacterial populations.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: GIP
Stelor/Laboratoire d'Hygiène et de Recherche en Santé
Publique, 11 bis rue Gabriel Péri, BP 288, 54515 Vandoeuvre
lès Nancy Cedex, France. Phone: 33-(0)3-83-50-36-35. Fax:
33-(0)3-83-57-90-75. E-mail: block{at}pharma.u-nancy.fr.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| J. Bacteriol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Eukaryot. Cell | All ASM Journals |
|---|