AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaffner, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Montville, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaffner, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Montville, T. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schaffner, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Montville, T. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 1998, p. 4416-4422, Vol. 64, No. 11
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Analysis of the Influence of Environmental Parameters on Clostridium botulinum Time-to-Toxicity by Using Three Modeling Approachesdagger

Donald W. Schaffner,1,* William H. Ross,2 and Thomas J. Montville1

Department of Food Science, Rutgers---The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901-8520,1 and Health Canada, Food Directorate, Banting Research Center, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L2, Canada2

Received 2 April 1998/Accepted 12 August 1998

This study used the technique of waiting time modeling to analyze the combined effects of temperature, pH, carbohydrate, protein, and lipid on the time-to-toxicity of Clostridium botulinum 56A. Waiting time models can be used whenever the time to the occurrence of some event is the variable of interest. In the case of the time-to-toxicity data, the variable is the time from the beginning of an experiment until a tube is identified as positive. The statistical analysis used the SAS procedure LIFEREG and included determination of the form of the response surface, identification of the error distribution, and simplification of the response surface. We found that increasing the macromolecule concentration decreased the probability of toxin formation. The probability of toxin formation also decreased at lower temperatures and at pHs further from the optimum. The waiting time modeling approach to developing models for botulinal toxin formation compared favorably with other approaches but had one specific advantage. Waiting time models have the inherent advantage that safety concerns regarding predictions are automatically quantified in the analysis by formally identifying a distribution of times-to-toxicity. The use of this time-to-toxicity distribution permits a customizable margin of safety (e.g., one in a million) not possible with other approaches.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Food Science, Rutgers---The State University of New Jersey, 65 Dudley Rd., New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8520. Phone: (732) 932-9611, ext. 214. Fax: (732) 932-6776. E-mail: schaffner{at}aesop.rutgers.edu.

dagger Publication D-10122-1-97 of the New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 1998, p. 4416-4422, Vol. 64, No. 11
0099-2240/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.