This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Velicer, G. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Velicer, G. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Velicer, G. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 1999, p. 264-269, Vol. 65, No. 1
0099-2240/99/$00.00+0

Pleiotropic Effects of Adaptation to a Single Carbon Source for Growth on Alternative Substrates

Gregory J. Velicer*

Center for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Received 17 August 1998/Accepted 8 October 1998

It is frequently assumed that populations of genetically modified microorganisms will perform their intended function and then disappear from the environment due to inherent fitness disadvantages resulting from their genetic alteration. However, modified organisms used in bioremediation can be expected to adapt evolutionarily to growth on the anthropogenic substrate that they are intended to degrade. If such adaptation results in improved competitiveness for alternative, naturally occurring substrates, then this will increase the likelihood that the modified organisms will persist in the environment. In this study, bacteria capable of degrading the herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) were used to test the effects of evolutionary adaptation to one substrate on fitness during growth on an alternative substrate. Twenty lineages of bacteria were allowed to evolve under abundant resource conditions on either 2,4-D or succinate as their sole carbon source. The competitiveness of each evolved line was then measured relative to that of its ancestor for growth on both substrates. Only three derived lines showed a clear drop in fitness on the alternative substrate after demonstrable adaptation to their selective substrate, while five derived lines showed significant simultaneous increases in fitness on both their selective and alternative substrates. These data demonstrate that adaptation to an anthropogenic substrate can pleiotropically increase competitiveness for an alternative natural substrate and therefore increase the likelihood that a genetically modified organism will persist in the environment.


* Mailing address: Center for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824. Phone: (517) 353-0809. Fax: (517) 353-9334. E-mail: velicerg{at}pilot.msu.edu.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 1999, p. 264-269, Vol. 65, No. 1
0099-2240/99/$00.00+0



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hall, A. R, Colegrave, N. (2007). How does resource supply affect evolutionary diversification?. Proc R Soc B 274: 73-78 [Abstract] [Full Text]