This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilkins, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Jonker, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilkins, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Jonker, R. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wilkins, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Jonker, R. R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 1999, p. 4404-4410, Vol. 65, No. 10
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Identification of Phytoplankton from Flow Cytometry Data by Using Radial Basis Function Neural Networks

M. F. Wilkins,1 Lynne Boddy,1,* C. W. Morris,2 and R. R. Jonker3,dagger

Cardiff School of Biosciences, University of Cardiff, Cardiff CF1 3TL,1 and School of Computing, University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd CF37 1DL,2 United Kingdom, and Department of Aquatic Ecology, Universiteit van Amsterdam, 1098 SM Amsterdam, The Netherlands3

Received 12 April 1999/Accepted 20 July 1999

We describe here the application of a type of artificial neural network, the Gaussian radial basis function (RBF) network, in the identification of a large number of phytoplankton strains from their 11-dimensional flow cytometric characteristics measured by the European Optical Plankton Analyser instrument. The effect of network parameters on optimization is examined. Optimized RBF networks recognized 34 species of marine and freshwater phytoplankton with 91.5% success overall. The relative importance of each measured parameter in discriminating these data and the behavior of RBF networks in response to data from "novel" species (species not present in the training data) were analyzed.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Cardiff School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, P.O. Box 915, Cardiff CF1 3TL, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1222-874776. Fax: 44-1222-874305. E-mail: BoddyL{at}cf.ac.uk.

dagger Present address: AquaSense Lab, 1090 HC Amsterdam, The Netherlands.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 1999, p. 4404-4410, Vol. 65, No. 10
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Widmer, K. W., Oshima, K. H., Pillai, S. D. (2002). Identification of Cryptosporidium parvum Oocysts by an Artificial Neural Network Approach. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 1115-1121 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Day, J. P., Kell, D. B., Griffith, G. W. (2002). Differentiation of Phytophthora infestans Sporangia from Other Airborne Biological Particles by Flow Cytometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68: 37-45 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Moschetti, G., Blaiotta, G., Villani, F., Coppola, S., Parente, E. (2001). Comparison of Statistical Methods for Identification of Streptococcus thermophilus, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus faecium from Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA Patterns. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 2156-2166 [Abstract] [Full Text]