Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 1999, p. 4734-4740, Vol. 65, No. 11
Institute of Plant Biology,
Received 1 March 1999/Accepted 15 July 1999
The effect of selenite on growth kinetics, the ability of cultures
to reduce selenite, and the mechanism of detoxification of selenium
were investigated by using Rhodospirillum rubrum. Anoxic
photosynthetic cultures were able to completely reduce as much as 1.5 mM selenite, whereas in aerobic cultures a 0.5 mM selenite
concentration was only reduced to about 0.375 mM. The presence of
selenite in the culture medium strongly affected cell division. In the
presence of a selenite concentration of 1.5 mM cultures reached final
cell densities that were only about 15% of the control final cell
density. The cell density remained nearly constant during the
stationary phase for all of the selenite concentrations tested, showing
that the cells were not severely damaged by the presence of selenite or
elemental selenium. Particles containing elemental selenium were
observed in the cytoplasm, which led to an increase in the buoyant
density of the cells. Interestingly, the change in the buoyant density
was reversed after selenite reduction was complete; the buoyant density
of the cells returned to the buoyant density of the control cells. This
demonstrated that R. rubrum expels elemental selenium
across the plasma membrane and the cell wall. Accordingly,
electron-dense particles were more numerous in the cells during the
reduction phase than after the reduction phase.
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Reduction of Selenite and Detoxification of
Elemental Selenium by the Phototrophic Bacterium
Rhodospirillum rubrum
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of
Plant Biology, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH-8008
Zurich, Switzerland. Phone: 01 634 82 11. Fax: 01 634 82 04. E-mail:
Janine.Kessi{at}access.unizh.ch.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 1999, p. 4734-4740, Vol. 65, No. 11
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| J. Bacteriol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Eukaryot. Cell | All ASM Journals |
|---|