This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Netherwood, T.
Right arrow Articles by O'Donnell, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Netherwood, T.
Right arrow Articles by O'Donnell, A. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Netherwood, T.
Right arrow Articles by O'Donnell, A. G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 1999, p. 5134-5138, Vol. 65, No. 11
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Probiotics Shown To Change Bacterial Community Structure in the Avian Gastrointestinal Tract

Trudy Netherwood,1,2,* H. J. Gilbert,1 D. S. Parker,1 and A. G. O'Donnell2

Department of Biological and Nutritional Sciences1 and Department of Agriculture and Environmental Science,2 University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, Great Britain

Received 26 April 1999/Accepted 9 August 1999

Culturing and molecular techniques were used to monitor changes in the bacterial flora of the avian gastrointestinal (GI) tract following introduction of genetically modified (GM) and unmodified probiotics. Community hybridization of amplified 16S ribosomal DNA demonstrated that the bacterial flora of the GI tract changed significantly in response to the probiotic treatments. The changes were not detected by culturing. Although both GM and non-GM strains of Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 11508 changed the bacterial flora of the chicken GI tract, they did so differently. Probing the community DNA with an Enterococcus faecalis-specific probe showed that the relative amount of E. faecalis in the total eubacterial population increased in the presence of the non-GM strain and decreased in the presence of the GM probiotic compared with the results obtained with an untreated control group.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Agriculture and Environmental Science, King George VI Building, University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 7RU, Great Britain. Phone: 0191 222 5044. Fax: 0191 222 5228. E-mail: trudy.netherwood{at}newcastle.ac.uk.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 1999, p. 5134-5138, Vol. 65, No. 11
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Stephenson, D. P., Moore, R. J., Allison, G. E. (2009). Comparison and Utilization of Repetitive-Element PCR Techniques for Typing Lactobacillus Isolates from the Chicken Gastrointestinal Tract. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 6764-6776 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Vandeplas, S., Dauphin, R. D., Thiry, C., Beckers, Y., Welling, G. W., Thonart, P., Thewis, A. (2009). Efficiency of a Lactobacillus plantarum-xylanase combination on growth performances, microflora populations, and nutrient digestibilities of broilers infected with Salmonella Typhimurium. Poult. Sci. 88: 1643-1654 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Szabo, I., Wieler, L. H., Tedin, K., Scharek-Tedin, L., Taras, D., Hensel, A., Appel, B., Nockler, K. (2009). Influence of a Probiotic Strain of Enterococcus faecium on Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium DT104 Infection in a Porcine Animal Infection Model. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 2621-2628 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Willis, W. L., Reid, L. (2008). Investigating the Effects of Dietary Probiotic Feeding Regimens on Broiler Chicken Production and Campylobacter jejuni Presence. Poult. Sci. 87: 606-611 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Willis, W. L., Isikhuemhen, O. S., Ibrahim, S. A. (2007). Performance Assessment of Broiler Chickens Given Mushroom Extract Alone or in Combination with Probiotics. Poult. Sci. 86: 1856-1860 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Santos, F. B. O., Sheldon, B. W., Santos, A. A. Jr., Ferket, P. R., Lee, M. D., Petroso, A., Smith, D. (2007). Determination of Ileum Microbial Diversity of Broilers Fed Triticale- or Corn-Based Diets and Colonized by Salmonella. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 16: 563-573 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Holben, W. E., Feris, K. P., Kettunen, A., Apajalahti, J. H. A. (2004). GC Fractionation Enhances Microbial Community Diversity Assessment and Detection of Minority Populations of Bacteria by Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 2263-2270 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lu, J., Idris, U., Harmon, B., Hofacre, C., Maurer, J. J., Lee, M. D. (2003). Diversity and Succession of the Intestinal Bacterial Community of the Maturing Broiler Chicken. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 6816-6824 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chambers, P. A., Duggan, P. S., Heritage, J., Forbes, J. M. (2002). The fate of antibiotic resistance marker genes in transgenic plant feed material fed to chickens. J Antimicrob Chemother 49: 161-164 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Simpson, J. M., McCracken, V. J., Gaskins, H. R., Mackie, R. I. (2000). Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis Analysis of 16S Ribosomal DNA Amplicons To Monitor Changes in Fecal Bacterial Populations of Weaning Pigs after Introduction of Lactobacillus reuteri Strain MM53. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 4705-4714 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Jin, L. Z., Marquardt, R. R., Zhao, X. (2000). A Strain of Enterococcus faecium (18C23) Inhibits Adhesion of Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 to Porcine Small Intestine Mucus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 4200-4204 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Netherwood, T., Bowden, R., Harrison, P., O'Donnell, A. G., Parker, D. S., Gilbert, H. J. (1999). Gene Transfer in the Gastrointestinal Tract. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65: 5139-5141 [Abstract] [Full Text]