This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wouters, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lelieveld, H. L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wouters, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lelieveld, H. L. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wouters, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Lelieveld, H. L. M.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 1999, p. 5364-5371, Vol. 65, No. 12
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Effects of Pulsed Electric Fields on Inactivation Kinetics of Listeria innocua

Patrick C. Wouters,* Nicole Dutreux,dagger Jan P. P. M. Smelt, and Huub L. M. Lelieveld

Microbiology & Preservation, Unilever Research Vlaardingen, 3133 AT Vlaardingen, The Netherlands

Received 7 May 1999/Accepted 9 September 1999

The effects of pulsed electric field (PEF) treatment and processing factors on the inactivation kinetics of Listeria innocua NCTC 11289 were investigated by using a pilot plant PEF unit with a flow rate of 200 liters/h. The electric field strength, pulse length, number of pulses, and inlet temperature were the most significant process factors influencing the inactivation kinetics. Product factors (pH and conductivity) also influenced the inactivation kinetics. In phosphate buffer at pH 4.0 and 0.5 S/m at 40°C, a 3.0-V/µm PEF treatment at an inlet temperature of 40°C resulted in >= 6.3 log inactivation of strain NCTC 11289 at 49.5°C. A synergistic effect between temperature and PEF inactivation was also observed. The inactivation obtained with PEF was compared to the inactivation obtained with heat. We found that heat inactivation was less effective than PEF inactivation under similar time and temperature conditions. L. innocua cells which were incubated for a prolonged time in the stationary phase were more resistant to the PEF treatment, indicating that the physiological state of the microorganism plays a role in inactivation by PEF. Sublethal injury of cells was observed after PEF treatment, and the injury was more severe when the level of treatment was increased. Overall, our results indicate that it may be possible to use PEF in future applications in order to produce safe products.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Microbiology & Preservation, Unilever Research Vlaardingen, Olivier van Noortlaan 120, 3133 AT Vlaardingen, The Netherlands. Phone: 31-10-4605028. Fax: 31-10-4605188. E-mail: Patrick.Wouters{at}Unilever.com.

dagger Present address: TNO Voeding, 3700 AJ Zeist, The Netherlands.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 1999, p. 5364-5371, Vol. 65, No. 12
0099-2240/99/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1999, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Wouters, P. C., Bos, A. P., Ueckert, J. (2001). Membrane Permeabilization in Relation to Inactivation Kinetics of Lactobacillus Species due to Pulsed Electric Fields. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 3092-3101 [Abstract] [Full Text]