AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anglès d'Auriac, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Berg, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anglès d'Auriac, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Berg, J. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Anglès d'Auriac, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Berg, J. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2000, p. 4401-4407, Vol. 66, No. 10
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Field Evaluation of a Semiautomated Method for Rapid and Simple Analysis of Recreational Water Microbiological Quality

Marc B. Anglès d'Auriac,1,* Hildegarde Roberts,2 Terri Shaw,2 Reidun Sirevåg,1 Leonila Fajardo Hermansen,3 and James D. Berg3

Division of Molecular Biology, Department of Biology, University of Oslo, NO-0316 Oslo,1 and Nyecolifast AS Strandveien 35, 1366 Lysaker,3 Norway, and Environment Agency Llanelli Laboratory, Llanelli, Carmarthen SA15 4EL, United Kingdom2

Received 3 March 2000/Accepted 19 July 2000

An early warning system using a rapid enzymatic semiautomated method suitable for fecal coliform detection in recreational waters within 8 h was developed further and evaluated in this study. This rapid method was compared to the standard method followed in the United Kingdom. We used 1,011 samples originating from 206 different locations in Wales. When we assessed the presence or absence of fecal coliforms, targeting very low levels of contamination, we obtained 83.9% agreement between the rapid method and the lauryl sulfate broth-membrane filtration technique, whereas direct confirmation of the samples processed by the rapid method showed 89.3% agreement. Environmental enzymatic background activity was found to be the main limiting factor for this method. Owing to a specific and integrated handling of the results by the software of the instrument, the percentage of false-positive results (a consequence of enzymatic background) was successfully limited to 2.9% by the direct confirmation evaluation. However, 7.8% false-negative results due to "late-growers" had to be accepted in order to produce results within a working day. At present, the method can be used in a more conservative way to assess the environmental threshold of 100 CFU of fecal coliforms per 100 ml in recreational waters. The implications of our findings with regard to the applicability of rapid enzymatic methods are discussed.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biology, University of Oslo, Box 1066, Moltke Moes vei 32, N-0316 Oslo, Norway. Phone: 47-22-85-47-93. Fax: 47-22-85-46-05. E-mail: m.d.a.angles{at}bio.uio.no.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2000, p. 4401-4407, Vol. 66, No. 10
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.






Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2000 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.