Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2000, p. 5174-5181, Vol. 66, No. 12
Department of Biochemistry, University of
Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1GA,1 and
Horticulture Research International, Wellesbourne,
Warwickshire, CV35 9EF,2 United Kingdom
Received 10 April 2000/Accepted 18 September 2000
Bacillus thuringiensis protein
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Role of Proteolysis in Determining Potency of
Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac
-Endotoxin

-endotoxins are toxic
to a variety of different insect species. Larvicidal potency depends on
the completion of a number of steps in the mode of action of the toxin.
Here, we investigated the role of proteolytic processing in determining
the potency of the B. thuringiensis Cry1Ac
-endotoxin towards Pieris brassicae (family: Pieridae) and
Mamestra brassicae (family: Noctuidae). In bioassays,
Cry1Ac was over 2,000 times more active against P. brassicae than against M. brassicae larvae. Using gut
juice purified from both insects, we processed Cry1Ac to soluble forms
that had the same N terminus and the same apparent molecular weight.
However, extended proteolysis of Cry1Ac in vitro with proteases from
both insects resulted in the formation of an insoluble aggregate. With
proteases from P. brassicae, the Cry1Ac-susceptible insect,
Cry1Ac was processed to an insoluble product with a molecular mass of
~56 kDa, whereas proteases from M. brassicae, the
non-susceptible insect, generated products with molecular masses of
~58, ~40, and ~20 kDa. N-terminal sequencing of the insoluble
products revealed that both insects cleaved Cry1Ac within domain I, but
M. brassicae proteases also cleaved the toxin at Arg423 in
domain II. A similar pattern of processing was observed in vivo. When
Arg423 was replaced with Gln or Ser, the resulting mutant toxins
resisted degradation by M. brassicae proteases. However,
this mutation had little effect on toxicity to M. brassicae. Differential processing of membrane-bound Cry1Ac was
also observed in qualitative binding experiments performed with brush
border membrane vesicles from the two insects and in midguts isolated from toxin-treated insects.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Biochemistry, Old Addenbrookes Site, University of Cambridge, 80 Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1GA, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 (0) 1223 333651. Fax: 44 (0) 1223 766043. E-mail:
djel{at}mole.bio.cam.ac.uk.
Present address: Celltech Chiroscience plc, Slough, Berkshire, SL1
4EN, United Kingdom.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| J. Bacteriol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. | Eukaryot. Cell | All ASM Journals |
|---|