This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lucore, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jaykus, L.-A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lucore, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jaykus, L.-A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lucore, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Jaykus, L.-A.

Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2000, p. 1769-1776, Vol. 66, No. 5
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Immobilization with Metal Hydroxides as a Means To Concentrate Food-Borne Bacteria for Detection by Cultural and Molecular Methodsdagger

Lisa A. Lucore,Dagger Mark A. Cullison, and Lee-Ann Jaykus*

Department of Food Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7624

Received 11 October 1999/Accepted 17 January 2000

The application of nucleic acid amplification methods to the detection of food-borne pathogens could be facilitated by concentrating the organisms from the food matrix before detection. This study evaluated the utility of metal hydroxide immobilization for the concentration of bacterial cells from dairy foods prior to detection by cultural and molecular methods. Using reconstituted nonfat dry milk (NFDM) as a model, two food-borne pathogens (Listeria monocytogenes and Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis) were concentrated from 25-ml samples by the sequential steps of clarification and high-speed centrifugation (designated primary concentration) and immobilization with zirconium hydroxide and low-speed centrifugation (designated secondary concentration). Sample volume reduction after immobilization with zirconium hydroxide was 50-fold, with total bacterial recoveries ranging from 78 to 96% of input for serovar Enteritidis and 65 to 96% of input for L. monocytogenes. Immobilized bacteria remained viable and could be enumerated by standard cultural procedures. When followed by RNA extraction and subsequent detection by reverse transcription (RT)-PCR, detection limits of 101 to 102 CFU/25 ml of reconstituted NFDM were achieved for both organisms. The bacterial-immobilization step was relatively nonspecific, resulting in recovery of >50% of the input cells when evaluated on a panel of representative bacterial strains of significance to foods. The method could be adapted to more complex dairy products, such as whole milk and ice cream, for which bacterial recoveries after immobilization ranged from 64 to >100%, with subsequent RT-PCR detection limits of >= 102 CFU/ml for whole milk and >= 101 CFU for ice cream for both serovar Enteritidis and L. monocytogenes. The bacterial-immobilization method is easy, rapid, and inexpensive and may have applications for the concentration of a wide variety of food-borne bacteria prior to detection by both conventional and alternative methods.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Food Science, Box 7624, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7624. Phone: (919) 515-2971. Fax: (919) 515-7124. E-mail: leeann_jaykus{at}ncsu.edu.

dagger This paper is number FSR-99-38 in the journal series of the Department of Food Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7624.

Dagger Present address: Department of Food Science and Technology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2000, p. 1769-1776, Vol. 66, No. 5
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Schindler, B. D., Shelef, L. A. (2006). Immobilization and Detection of Listeria monocytogenes.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 4426-4428 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Neeley, E. T., Phister, T. G., Mills, D. A. (2005). Differential Real-Time PCR Assay for Enumeration of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Wine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 8954-8957 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Rider, T. H., Petrovick, M. S., Nargi, F. E., Harper, J. D., Schwoebel, E. D., Mathews, R. H., Blanchard, D. J., Bortolin, L. T., Young, A. M., Chen, J., Hollis, M. A. (2003). A B Cell-Based Sensor for Rapid Identification of Pathogens. Science 301: 213-215 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Koo, K., Jaykus, L.-A. (2003). Detection of Listeria monocytogenes from a Model Food by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer-Based PCR with an Asymmetric Fluorogenic Probe Set. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69: 1082-1088 [Abstract] [Full Text]