This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chandler, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Brockman, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chandler, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Brockman, F. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chandler, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Brockman, F. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2000, p. 3438-3445, Vol. 66, No. 8
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Affinity Purification of DNA and RNA from Environmental Samples with Peptide Nucleic Acid Clamps

Darrell P. Chandler,1,* Jennie R. Stults,1 Sharon Cebula,2 Beatrice L. Schuck,1 Derek W. Weaver,1 Kevin K. Anderson,2 Michael Egholm,3 and Fred J. Brockman1

Environmental Microbiology Group1 and Statistical Resources Group,2 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, and PerSeptive Biosystems, Framingham, Massachusetts 017103

Received 20 March 2000/Accepted 30 May 2000

Bispeptide nucleic acids (bis-PNAs; PNA clamps), PNA oligomers, and DNA oligonucleotides were evaluated as affinity purification reagents for subfemtomolar 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and rRNA targets in soil, sediment, and industrial air filter nucleic acid extracts. Under low-salt hybridization conditions (10 mM NaPO4, 5 mM disodium EDTA, and 0.025% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]) a PNA clamp recovered significantly more target DNA than either PNA or DNA oligomers. The efficacy of PNA clamps and oligomers was generally enhanced in the presence of excess nontarget DNA and in a low-salt extraction-hybridization buffer. Under high-salt conditions (200 mM NaPO4, 100 mM disodium EDTA, and 0.5% SDS), however, capture efficiencies with the DNA oligomer were significantly greater than with the PNA clamp and PNA oligomer. Recovery and detection efficiencies for target DNA concentrations of >= 100 pg were generally >20% but depended upon the specific probe, solution background, and salt condition. The DNA probe had a lower absolute detection limit of 100 fg of target (830 zM [1 zM = 10-21 M]) in high-salt buffer. In the absence of exogenous DNA (e.g., soil background), neither the bis-PNA nor the PNA oligomer achieved the same absolute detection limit even under a more favorable low-salt hybridization condition. In the presence of a soil background, however, both PNA probes provided more sensitive absolute purification and detection (830 zM) than the DNA oligomer. In varied environmental samples, the rank order for capture probe performance in high-salt buffer was DNA > PNA > clamp. Recovery of 16S rRNA from environmental samples mirrored quantitative results for DNA target recovery, with the DNA oligomer generating more positive results than either the bis-PNA or PNA oligomer, but PNA probes provided a greater incidence of detection from environmental samples that also contained a higher concentration of nontarget DNA and RNA. Significant interactions between probe type and environmental sample indicate that the most efficacious capture system depends upon the particular sample type (and background nucleic acid concentration), target (DNA or RNA), and detection objective.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Environmental Microbiology Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 900 Battelle Blvd., P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop P7-50, Richland, WA 99352. Phone: (509) 376-8644. Fax: (509) 376-1321. E-mail: dp.chandler{at}pnl.gov.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2000, p. 3438-3445, Vol. 66, No. 8
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Lim, D. V., Simpson, J. M., Kearns, E. A., Kramer, M. F. (2005). Current and Developing Technologies for Monitoring Agents of Bioterrorism and Biowarfare. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 18: 583-607 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Chandler, D. P., Jarrell, A. E. (2004). Automated Purification and Suspension Array Detection of 16S rRNA from Soil and Sediment Extracts by Using Tunable Surface Microparticles. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 2621-2631 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Small, J., Call, D. R., Brockman, F. J., Straub, T. M., Chandler, D. P. (2001). Direct Detection of 16S rRNA in Soil Extracts by Using Oligonucleotide Microarrays. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67: 4708-4716 [Abstract] [Full Text]