Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2000, p. 3438-3445, Vol. 66, No. 8
Environmental Microbiology
Group1 and Statistical Resources
Group,2 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory,
Richland, Washington 99352, and PerSeptive Biosystems,
Framingham, Massachusetts 017103
Received 20 March 2000/Accepted 30 May 2000
Bispeptide nucleic acids (bis-PNAs; PNA clamps), PNA oligomers, and
DNA oligonucleotides were evaluated as affinity purification reagents
for subfemtomolar 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and rRNA targets in
soil, sediment, and industrial air filter nucleic acid extracts. Under low-salt hybridization conditions (10 mM NaPO4, 5 mM
disodium EDTA, and 0.025% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]) a PNA clamp
recovered significantly more target DNA than either PNA or DNA
oligomers. The efficacy of PNA clamps and oligomers was generally
enhanced in the presence of excess nontarget DNA and in a low-salt
extraction-hybridization buffer. Under high-salt conditions
(200 mM NaPO4, 100 mM disodium EDTA, and 0.5% SDS),
however, capture efficiencies with the DNA oligomer were significantly
greater than with the PNA clamp and PNA oligomer. Recovery and
detection efficiencies for target DNA concentrations of
0099-2240/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Affinity Purification of DNA and RNA from
Environmental Samples with Peptide Nucleic Acid Clamps
100 pg were
generally >20% but depended upon the specific probe, solution
background, and salt condition. The DNA probe had a lower absolute
detection limit of 100 fg of target (830 zM [1 zM = 10
21 M]) in high-salt buffer. In the absence of
exogenous DNA (e.g., soil background), neither the bis-PNA nor the PNA
oligomer achieved the same absolute detection limit even under a more
favorable low-salt hybridization condition. In the presence of a soil
background, however, both PNA probes provided more sensitive absolute
purification and detection (830 zM) than the DNA oligomer. In varied
environmental samples, the rank order for capture probe performance in
high-salt buffer was DNA > PNA > clamp. Recovery of 16S
rRNA from environmental samples mirrored quantitative results for DNA
target recovery, with the DNA oligomer generating more positive results
than either the bis-PNA or PNA oligomer, but PNA probes provided a
greater incidence of detection from environmental samples that also
contained a higher concentration of nontarget DNA and RNA. Significant
interactions between probe type and environmental sample indicate that
the most efficacious capture system depends upon the particular sample type (and background nucleic acid concentration), target (DNA or RNA),
and detection objective.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Environmental
Microbiology Group, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 900 Battelle Blvd., P.O. Box 999, Mail Stop P7-50, Richland, WA 99352. Phone: (509)
376-8644. Fax: (509) 376-1321. E-mail:
dp.chandler{at}pnl.gov.
This article has been cited by other articles:
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»