AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shelton, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Karns, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shelton, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Karns, J. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shelton, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Karns, J. S.

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2001, p. 2908-2915, Vol. 67, No. 7
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.7.2908-2915.2001

Quantitative Detection of Escherichia coli O157 in Surface Waters by Using Immunomagnetic Electrochemiluminescence

Daniel R. Shelton* and Jeffrey S. Karns

Animal Waste Pathogens Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, Maryland

Received 11 December 2000/Accepted 11 April 2001

A protocol for the quantitative detection of Escherichia coli O157 in raw and concentrated surface waters using immunomagnetic electrochemiluminescence (IM-ECL) was developed and optimized. Three antibody sandwich formats were tested: commercial anti-O157:H7 IM beads, IM beads made in-house with a polyclonal anti-O157:H7 immunoglobulin G (IgG), or IM beads made in-house with a monoclonal anti-O157:H7 IgG coupled with a polyclonal anti-O157:H7 IgG to which an electrochemiluminescent label (TAG) was attached. The monoclonal IM bead-polyclonal TAG format was chosen for optimization because it gave lower background levels and linear regression slopes of ca. 1.0, indicative of a constant ECL signal per cell. The dynamic range was ca. 101 to 105 cells ml-1 in phosphate-buffered saline and in raw water samples. The monoclonal IM beads selectively captured E. coli O157 cells in the presence of ca. 108 cells of a non-O157 strain of E. coli ml-1. Background ECL signals from concentrated (100-fold) water samples were substantially higher and more variable than raw water samples. The background signal was partially eliminated by the addition of polyvinylpolypyrrolidone. Successive cell capture incubations, termed sequential bead capture (SBC), were optimized for establishing baseline ECL values for individual water samples. The linear dynamic range with SBC was ca. 102 to 105 E. coli O157 cells ml of concentrated water-1. To validate the protocol, 10-liter surface water samples were spiked with ca. 5,000 E. coli O157 (Odwalla) cells and concentrated by vortex filtration, and 1- or 3-ml aliquots were analyzed by IM-ECL. Differential ECL signals (SBC) from 1- and 3-ml samples were statistically significant and were generally consistent with standard curves for these cell concentrations. Enrichments were conducted with aliquots of spiked raw water and concentrated water using EC broth and minimal lactose broth (MLB). All tubes with concentrated water became turbid and gave a positive ECL response for E. coli O157 (>10,000 ECL units); MLB gave a somewhat higher detection rate with spiked raw water. The potential sensitivity of the IM-ECL assay is ca. 25 E. coli O157 cells ml of raw water-1, 25 cells 100 ml of 100-fold concentrated water-1, or 1 to 2 viable cells liter-1 with concentration and enrichment. The IM-ECL assay appears suitable for routine analysis and screening of water samples.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: USDA/ARS/ANRI/AWPL, Bldg. 001, BARC-West, 10300 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville, MD 20705-2350. Phone: (301) 504-6582. Fax: (301) 504-5048. E-mail: sheltond{at}ba.ars.usda.gov.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2001, p. 2908-2915, Vol. 67, No. 7
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.7.2908-2915.2001



This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.