Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2001, p. 3665-3670, Vol. 67, No. 8
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.8.3665-3670.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Bacillus Spore Inactivation Methods
Affect Detection Assays
Jessica L.
Dang,1,*
Karen
Heroux,1
John
Kearney,2
Ameneh
Arasteh,3
Mark
Gostomski,3 and
Peter
A.
Emanuel3
Geo-Centers, Inc., Lanham, Maryland
207061; Department of Microbiology,
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
352942; and Research and Technology Directorate,
U.S. Army Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving
Ground, Maryland 210103
Received 12 January 2001/Accepted 25 May 2001
Detection of biological weapons is a primary concern in
force protection, treaty verification, and safeguarding
civilian populations against domestic terrorism. One great concern is
the detection of Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent of
anthrax. Assays for detection in the laboratory often employ
inactivated preparations of spores or nonpathogenic simulants. This
study uses several common biodetection platforms to detect B. anthracis spores that have been inactivated by two methods and
compares those data to detection of spores that have not been
inactivated. The data demonstrate that inactivation methods can affect
the sensitivity of nucleic acid- and antibody-based assays for the
detection of B. anthracis spores. These effects should be
taken into consideration when comparing laboratory results to data
collected and assayed during field deployment.
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Geo-Centers,
Inc., Gunpowder Branch, P.O. Box 68, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21010. Phone: (410) 436-8765. Fax: (410) 436-1912. E-mail:
jessica.dang{at}sbccom.apgea.army.mil.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2001, p. 3665-3670, Vol. 67, No. 8
0099-2240/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.67.8.3665-3670.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Kuehn, A., Kovac, P., Saksena, R., Bannert, N., Klee, S. R., Ranisch, H., Grunow, R.
(2009). Development of Antibodies against Anthrose Tetrasaccharide for Specific Detection of Bacillus anthracis Spores. CVI
16: 1728-1737
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Herzog, A. B., McLennan, S. D., Pandey, A. K., Gerba, C. P., Haas, C. N., Rose, J. B., Hashsham, S. A.
(2009). Implications of Limits of Detection of Various Methods for Bacillus anthracis in Computing Risks to Human Health. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
75: 6331-6339
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dauphin, L. A., Newton, B. R., Rasmussen, M. V., Meyer, R. F., Bowen, M. D.
(2008). Gamma Irradiation Can Be Used To Inactivate Bacillus anthracis Spores without Compromising the Sensitivity of Diagnostic Assays. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
74: 4427-4433
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Helfinstine, S. L., Vargas-Aburto, C., Uribe, R. M., Woolverton, C. J.
(2005). Inactivation of Bacillus Endospores in Envelopes by Electron Beam Irradiation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
71: 7029-7032
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Luna, V. A., King, D., Davis, C., Rycerz, T., Ewert, M., Cannons, A., Amuso, P., Cattani, J.
(2003). Novel Sample Preparation Method for Safe and Rapid Detection of Bacillus anthracis Spores in Environmental Powders and Nasal Swabs. J. Clin. Microbiol.
41: 1252-1255
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Higgins, J. A., Cooper, M., Schroeder-Tucker, L., Black, S., Miller, D., Karns, J. S., Manthey, E., Breeze, R., Perdue, M. L.
(2003). A Field Investigation of Bacillus anthracis Contamination of U.S. Department of Agriculture and Other Washington, D.C., Buildings during the Anthrax Attack of October 2001. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
69: 593-599
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhou, B., Wirsching, P., Janda, K. D.
(2002). Human antibodies against spores of the genus Bacillus: A model study for detection of and protection against anthrax and the bioterrorist threat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
99: 5241-5246
[Abstract]
[Full Text]