This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wilson, S. C. Articles by McGlone, J. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wilson, S. C. Articles by McGlone, J. J. Agricola Articles by Wilson, S. C. Articles by McGlone, J. J.

Airborne Microbial Flora in a Cattle Feedlot

Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas 79430,¹ USDA-ARS Livestock Issues Research Unit,² Department of Animal Science & Food Technology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 79409-2141³

Received 2 January 2002/ Accepted 10 April 2002

A total of 1,408 cattle held in eight commercial feedlot pens were used to examine the quantity and diversity of microorganisms in cattle feedlot air. The effect of two feeding patterns on the generation of airborne dust and the total numbers of microorganisms was also examined (four feedlot pens/treatment). Microbial samples were collected, and dust particles that were 2.5 µm or less in diameter were measured with a Dustrak monitor during the evening dust peak for 4 days at sites both upwind and downwind of the feedlot pens. An Andersen biological cascade sampler was employed with different medium and incubation combinations for the capture and identification of bacteria and fungi. The results showed that when bacteria were considered, only nonpathogenic gram-positive organisms were recovered. However, gram-negative bacteria may have been present in a viable but nonculturable state. Fungi were recovered in smaller numbers than bacteria, and none of the fungi were pathogenic. The Dustrak results showed that one feeding pattern resulted in cattle behavior that generated levels of downwind dust lower (P = 0.04) than the levels generated by the behavior resulting from the other feeding pattern. However, the Andersen sampler results showed that there were no differences between feeding patterns with regard to the total number or diversity of microorganisms. The disparity may have been due to the different operating principles of the two systems. The overall numbers of microorganisms recovered were lower than those reported in studies of intensively housed farm animals in which similar recovery techniques were used.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• LeJeune, J. T., Wetzel, A. N. (2007). Preharvest control of Escherichia coli O157 in cattle. J ANIM SCI 85: E73-E80 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Miller, D. N., Berry, E. D. (2005). Cattle Feedlot Soil Moisture and Manure Content: I. Impacts on Greenhouse Gases, Odor Compounds, Nitrogen Losses, and Dust. J. Environ. Qual. 34: 644-655 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Miller, D. N., Woodbury, B. L. (2003). Simple Protocols to Determine Dust Potentials from Cattle Feedlot Soil and Surface Samples. J. Environ. Qual. 32: 1634-1640 [Abstract] [Full Text]