This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by White, D. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by White, D. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by White, D. G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2003, p. 7153-7160, Vol. 69, No. 12
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7153-7160.2003

Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Enterococcus Species Isolated from Retail Meats

Joshua R. Hayes,1,2 Linda L. English,2 Peggy J. Carter,2 Terry Proescholdt,2 Kyung Y. Lee,2 David D. Wagner,2 and David G. White2*

Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742,1 Center for Veterinary Medicine, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, Maryland 207082

Received 16 May 2003/ Accepted 10 September 2003

From March 2001 to June 2002, a total of 981 samples of retail raw meats (chicken, turkey, pork, and beef) were randomly obtained from 263 grocery stores in Iowa and cultured for the presence of Enterococcus spp. A total of 1,357 enterococcal isolates were recovered from the samples, with contamination rates ranging from 97% of pork samples to 100% of ground beef samples. Enterococcus faecium was the predominant species recovered (61%), followed by E. faecalis (29%), and E. hirae (5.7%). E. faecium was the predominant species recovered from ground turkey (60%), ground beef (65%), and chicken breast (79%), while E. faecalis was the predominant species recovered from pork chops (54%). The incidence of resistance to many production and therapeutic antimicrobials differed among enterococci recovered from retail meat samples. Resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin, a human analogue of the production drug virginiamycin, was observed in 54, 27, 9, and 18% of E. faecium isolates from turkey, chicken, pork, and beef samples, respectively. No resistance to linezolid or vancomycin was observed, but high-level gentamicin resistance was observed in 4% of enterococci, the majority of which were recovered from poultry retail meats. Results indicate that Enterococcus spp. commonly contaminate retail meats and that dissimilarities in antimicrobial resistance patterns among enterococci recovered from different meat types may reflect the use of approved antimicrobial agents in each food animal production class.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Center for Veterinary Medicine, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, MD 20708. Phone: (301) 827-8037. Fax: (301) 827-8250. E-mail: dwhite{at}cvm.fda.gov.

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2003, p. 7153-7160, Vol. 69, No. 12
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.12.7153-7160.2003




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Macovei, L., Zurek, L. (2007). Influx of Enterococci and Associated Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence Genes from Ready-To-Eat Food to the Human Digestive Tract. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 6740-6747 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Diarra, M. S., Silversides, F. G., Diarrassouba, F., Pritchard, J., Masson, L., Brousseau, R., Bonnet, C., Delaquis, P., Bach, S., Skura, B. J., Topp, E. (2007). Impact of Feed Supplementation with Antimicrobial Agents on Growth Performance of Broiler Chickens, Clostridium perfringens and Enterococcus Counts, and Antibiotic Resistance Phenotypes and Distribution of Antimicrobial Resistance Determinants in Escherichia coli Isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 6566-6576 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Macovei, L., Zurek, L. (2006). Ecology of antibiotic resistance genes: characterization of enterococci from houseflies collected in food settings.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 4028-4035 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Dumonceaux, T. J., Hill, J. E., Hemmingsen, S. M., Van Kessel, A. G. (2006). Characterization of Intestinal Microbiota and Response to Dietary Virginiamycin Supplementation in the Broiler Chicken. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 2815-2823 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Lester, C. H., Frimodt-Moller, N., Sorensen, T. L., Monnet, D. L., Hammerum, A. M. (2006). In Vivo Transfer of the vanA Resistance Gene from an Enterococcus faecium Isolate of Animal Origin to an E. faecium Isolate of Human Origin in the Intestines of Human Volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50: 596-599 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • McDermott, P. F., Cullen, P., Hubert, S. K., McDermott, S. D., Bartholomew, M., Simjee, S., Wagner, D. D. (2005). Changes in Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Native Enterococcus faecium in Chickens Fed Virginiamycin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 4986-4991 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • De Leener, E., Martel, A., De Graef, E. M., Top, J., Butaye, P., Haesebrouck, F., Willems, R., Decostere, A. (2005). Molecular Analysis of Human, Porcine, and Poultry Enterococcus faecium Isolates and Their erm(B) Genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71: 2766-2770 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hayes, J. R., English, L. L., Carr, L. E., Wagner, D. D., Joseph, S. W. (2004). Multiple-Antibiotic Resistance of Enterococcus spp. Isolated from Commercial Poultry Production Environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 6005-6011 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Johnston, L. M., Jaykus, L.-A. (2004). Antimicrobial Resistance of Enterococcus Species Isolated from Produce. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70: 3133-3137 [Abstract] [Full Text]  


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»