AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cullings, K. W.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, V. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cullings, K. W.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, V. T.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cullings, K. W.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, V. T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2003, p. 3772-3776, Vol. 69, No. 7
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.7.3772-3776.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Effects of Litter Addition on Ectomycorrhizal Associates of a Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta) Stand in Yellowstone National Park

Kenneth W. Cullings,1* Michael H. New,1 Shilpa Makhija,1 and V. Thomas Parker2

NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035-1000,1 Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California 941322

Received 12 September 2002/ Accepted 4 April 2003

Increasing soil nutrients through litter manipulation, pollution, or fertilization can adversely affect ectomycorrhizal (EM) communities by inhibiting fungal growth. In this study, we used molecular genetic methods to determine the effects of litter addition on the EM community of a Pinus contorta stand in Yellowstone National Park that regenerated after a stand-replacing fire. Two controls were used; in unmodified control plots nothing was added to the soil, and in perlite plots perlite, a chemically neutral substance, was added to maintain soil moisture and temperature at levels similar to those under litter. We found that (i) species richness did not change significantly following perlite addition (2.6 ± 0.3 species/core in control plots, compared with 2.3 ± 0.3 species/core in perlite plots) but decreased significantly (P < 0.05) following litter addition (1.8 ± 0.3 species/core); (ii) EM infection was not affected by the addition of perlite but increased significantly (P < 0.001) in response to litter addition, and the increase occurred only in the upper soil layer, directly adjacent to the added litter; and (iii) Suillus granulatus, Wilcoxina mikolae, and agaricoid DD were the dominant organisms in controls, but the levels of W. mikolae and agaricoid DD decreased significantly in response to both perlite and litter addition. The relative levels of S. granulatus and a fourth fungus, Cortinariaceae species 2, increased significantly (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively) following litter addition. Thus, litter addition resulted in some negative effects that may be attributable to moisture-temperature relationships rather than to the increased nutrients associated with litter. Some species respond positively to litter addition, indicating that there are differences in their physiologies. Hence, changes in the EM community induced by litter accumulation also may affect ecosystem function.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: NASA-Ames Research Center, Mountain View, CA 94035. Phone: (650) 604-2773. Fax: (650) 604-1088. E-mail: kcullings{at}mail.arc.nasa.gov.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2003, p. 3772-3776, Vol. 69, No. 7
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.7.3772-3776.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.