AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H.-W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H.-W.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chang, Y.-H.
Right arrow Articles by Liu, H.-W.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2003, p. 4502-4510, Vol. 69, No. 8
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4502-4510.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

PCR Assay of the groEL Gene for Detection and Differentiation of Bacillus cereus Group Cells

Yu-Hsiu Chang, Yung-Hui Shangkuan,* Hung-Chi Lin, and Hwan-Wun Liu

Division of Bacteriology, Institute of Preventive Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Sanhsia, Taipei, Taiwan 237, Republic of China

Received 13 November 2002/ Accepted 8 May 2003

Strains of species in the Bacillus cereus group are potentially enterotoxic. Thus, the detection of all B. cereus group strains is important. As 16S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis cannot adequately differentiate species of the B. cereus group, we explored the potential of the groEL gene as a phylogenetic marker. A phylogenetic analysis of the groEL sequences of 78 B. cereus group strains revealed that the B. cereus group strains were split into two major clusters, one including six B. mycoides and one B. pseudomycoides (cluster II) and the other including two B. mycoides and the rest of the B. cereus group strains (cluster I). Cluster I was further differentiated into two subclusters, Ia and Ib. The sodA gene sequences of representative strains from different clusters were also compared. The phylogenetic tree constructed from the sodA sequences showed substantial similarity to the tree constructed from the groEL sequences. Based on the groEL sequences, a PCR assay for detection and identification of B. cereus group strains was developed. Subsequent restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis verified the PCR amplicons and the differentiation of the B. cereus group strains. RFLP with MboI was identical for all the B. cereus group strains analyzed, while RFLP with MfeI or PstI classified all B. cereus and B. thuringiensis strains into two groups. All cluster II B. mycoides and B. pseudomycoides strains could be discriminated from other B. cereus group bacteria by restriction analysis with TspRI.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute of Preventive Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, P.O. Box 90048-700, Sanhsia, Taipei, Taiwan 237, Republic of China. Phone: (886 2) 8177 7038. Fax: (886 2) 2673 3025. E-mail: yhshangtw{at}yahoo.com.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2003, p. 4502-4510, Vol. 69, No. 8
0099-2240/03/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.8.4502-4510.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.