AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stres, B.
Right arrow Articles by Tiedje, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stres, B.
Right arrow Articles by Tiedje, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Stres, B.
Right arrow Articles by Tiedje, J. M.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2004, p. 301-309, Vol. 70, No. 1
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.1.301-309.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Nitrous Oxide Reductase (nosZ) Gene Fragments Differ between Native and Cultivated Michigan Soils

Blaz Stres,1,2 Ivan Mahne,2 Gorazd Avgustin,3 and James M. Tiedje1,4*

Center for Microbial Ecology,1 Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1325,4 Department of Food Science and Technology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana,2 Zootechnical Department, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1230 Domzale, Slovenia3

Received 12 June 2003/ Accepted 22 September 2003

The effect of standard agricultural management on the genetic heterogeneity of nitrous oxide reductase (nosZ) fragments from denitrifying prokaryotes in native and cultivated soil was explored. Thirty-six soil cores were composited from each of the two soil management conditions. nosZ gene fragments were amplified from triplicate samples, and PCR products were cloned and screened by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). The total nosZ RFLP profiles increased in similarity with soil sample size until triplicate 3-g samples produced visually identical RFLP profiles for each treatment. Large differences in total nosZ profiles were observed between the native and cultivated soils. The fragments representing major groups of clones encountered at least twice and four randomly selected clones with unique RFLP patterns were sequenced to verify nosZ identity. The sequence diversity of nosZ clones from the cultivated field was higher, and only eight patterns were found in clone libraries from both soils among the 182 distinct nosZ RFLP patterns identified from the two soils. A group of clones that comprised 32% of all clones dominated the gene library of native soil, whereas many minor groups were observed in the gene library of cultivated soil. The 95% confidence intervals of the Chao1 nonparametric richness estimator for nosZ RFLP data did not overlap, indicating that the levels of species richness are significantly different in the two soils, the cultivated soil having higher diversity. Phylogenetic analysis of deduced amino acid sequences grouped the majority of nosZ clones into an interleaved Michigan soil cluster whose cultured members are {alpha}-Proteobacteria. Only four nosZ sequences from cultivated soil and one from the native soil were related to sequences found in {gamma}-Proteobacteria. Sequences from the native field formed a distinct, closely related cluster (Dmean = 0.16) containing 91.6% of the native clones. Clones from the cultivated field were more distantly related to each other (Dmean = 0.26), and 65% were found outside of the cluster from the native soil, further indicating a difference in the two communities. Overall, there appears to be a relationship between use and richness, diversity, and the phylogenetic position of nosZ sequences, indicating that agricultural use of soil caused a shift to a more diverse denitrifying community.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Center for Microbial Ecology, Plant and Soil Sciences Building, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325. Phone: (517) 353-9021. Fax: (517) 353-2917. E-mail: tiedjej{at}pilot.msu.edu.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2004, p. 301-309, Vol. 70, No. 1
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.1.301-309.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.