AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Short, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zehr, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Short, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zehr, J. P.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Short, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Zehr, J. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2004, p. 2186-2192, Vol. 70, No. 4
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.4.2186-2192.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Two Diazotrophic Bacteria in the Chesapeake Bay

Steven M. Short, Bethany D. Jenkins, and Jonathan P. Zehr*

Department of Ocean Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95064

Received 10 October 2003/ Accepted 5 January 2004

The aim of this study was to initiate autecological studies on uncultivated natural populations of diazotrophic bacteria by examining the distribution of specific diazotrophs in the Chesapeake Bay. By use of quantitative PCR, the abundance of two nifH sequences (907h22 and 912h4) was quantified in water samples collected along a transect from the head to the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay during cruises in April and October 2001 and 2002. Standard curves for the quantitative PCR assays demonstrated that the relationship between gene copies and cycle threshold was linear and highly reproducible from 1 to 107 gene copies. The maximum number of 907h22 gene copies detected was approximately 140 ml–1 and the maximum number of 912h4 gene copies detected was approximately 340 ml–1. Sequence 912h4 was most abundant at the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay, and in general, its abundance increased with increasing salinity, with the highest abundances observed in April 2002. Overall, the 907h22 phylotype was most abundant at the mid-bay station. Additionally, 907h22 was most abundant in the April samples from the mid-bay and mouth of the Chesapeake Bay. Despite the fact that the Chesapeake Bay is rarely nitrogen limited, our results show that individual nitrogen-fixing bacteria have distinct nonrandom spatial and seasonal distributions in the Chesapeake Bay and are either distributed by specific physical processes or adapted to different environmental niches.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Ocean Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High St., Santa Cruz, CA 95064. Phone: (831) 459-4009. Fax: (831) 459-4882. E-mail: zehrj{at}es.ucsc.edu.

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, April 2004, p. 2186-2192, Vol. 70, No. 4
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.4.2186-2192.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.