This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Picioreanu, C. Articles by van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Picioreanu, C. Articles by van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. Agricola Articles by Picioreanu, C. Articles by van Loosdrecht, M. C. M.

Particle-Based Multidimensional Multispecies Biofilm Model

Department of Biochemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BC Delft, The Netherlands,¹ Theoretical Biology, University of Bonn, D-53115 Bonn, Germany²

Received 20 November 2003/ Accepted 16 January 2004

In this paper we describe a spatially multidimensional (two-dimensional [2-D] and three-dimensional [3-D]) particle-based approach for modeling the dynamics of multispecies biofilms growing on multiple substrates. The model is based on diffusion-reaction mass balances for chemical species coupled with microbial growth and spreading of biomass represented by hard spherical particles. Effectively, this is a scaled-up version of a previously proposed individual-based biofilm model. Predictions of this new particle-based model were quantitatively compared with those obtained with an established one-dimensional (1-D) multispecies model for equivalent problems. A nitrifying biofilm containing aerobic ammonium and nitrite oxidizers, anaerobic ammonium oxidizers, and inert biomass was chosen as an example. The 2-D and 3-D models generally gave the same results. If only the average flux of nutrients needs to be known, 2-D and 1-D models are very similar. However, the behavior of intermediates, which are produced and consumed in different locations within the biofilm, is better described in 2-D and 3-D models because of the multidirectional concentration gradients. The predictions of 2-D or 3-D models are also different from those of 1-D models for slowly growing or minority species in the biofilm. This aspect is related to the mechanism of biomass spreading or advection implemented in the models and should receive more attention in future experimental studies.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Krone, S. M., Lu, R., Fox, R., Suzuki, H., Top, E. M. (2007). Modelling the spatial dynamics of plasmid transfer and persistence. Microbiology 153: 2803-2816 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Xavier, J. B., Foster, K. R. (2007). From the Cover: Cooperation and conflict in microbial biofilms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 876-881 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Xavier, J. B., Picioreanu, C., Rani, S. A., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., Stewart, P. S. (2005). Biofilm-control strategies based on enzymic disruption of the extracellular polymeric substance matrix - a modelling study. Microbiology 151: 3817-3832 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kreft, J.-U., Bonhoeffer, S. (2005). The evolution of groups of cooperating bacteria and the growth rate versus yield trade-off. Microbiology 151: 637-641 [Full Text]  
• Roberts, M. E., Stewart, P. S. (2005). Modelling protection from antimicrobial agents in biofilms through the formation of persister cells. Microbiology 151: 75-80 [Abstract] [Full Text]