Previous Article | Next Article 
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2004, p. 4205-4210, Vol. 70, No. 7
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.7.4205-4210.2004
Effects of Tylosin Use on Erythromycin Resistance in Enterococci Isolated from Swine
Charlene R. Jackson,* Paula J. Fedorka-Cray, John B. Barrett, and Scott R. Ladely
Antimicrobial Resistance Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Athens, Georgia 30605
Received 24 November 2003/
Accepted 29 March 2004
The effect of tylosin on erythromycin-resistant enterococci was examined on three farms; farm A used tylosin for growth promotion, farm B used tylosin for treatment of disease, and farm C did not use tylosin for either growth promotion or disease treatment. A total of 1,187 enterococci were isolated from gestation, farrowing, suckling, nursery, and finishing swine from the farms. From a subset of those isolates (n = 662), 59% (124 out of 208), 28% (80 out of 281), and 2% (4 out of 170) were resistant to erythromycin (MIC
8 µg/ml) from farms A, B, and C, respectively. PCR analysis and Southern blotting revealed that 95% (65 out of 68) of isolates chosen from all three farms for further study were positive for ermB, but all were negative for ermA and ermC. By using Southern blotting, ermB was localized to the chromosome in 56 of the isolates while 9 isolates from farms A and B contained ermB on two similar-sized plasmid bands (12 to 16 kb). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis revealed that the isolates were genetically diverse and represented a heterogeneous population of enterococci. This study suggests that although there was resistance to a greater number of enterococcal isolates on a farm where tylosin was used as a growth promotant, resistant enterococci also existed on a farm where no antimicrobial agents were used.
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: 950 College Station Rd., United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Antimicrobial Resistance Research Unit, Richard B. Russell Research Center, Athens, GA 30605. Phone: (706) 546-3604. Fax: (706) 546-3616. E-mail:
cjackson{at}saa.ars.usda.gov.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2004, p. 4205-4210, Vol. 70, No. 7
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.7.4205-4210.2004
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Sharma, R., Larney, F. J., Chen, J., Yanke, L. J., Morrison, M., Topp, E., McAllister, T. A., Yu, Z.
(2009). Selected Antimicrobial Resistance during Composting of Manure from Cattle Administered Sub-Therapeutic Antimicrobials. J. Environ. Qual.
38: 567-575
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, J., Fluharty, F. L., St-Pierre, N., Morrison, M., Yu, Z.
(2008). Technical note: Occurrence in fecal microbiota of genes conferring resistance to both macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B and tetracyclines concomitant with feeding of beef cattle with tylosin. J ANIM SCI
86: 2385-2391
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jacob, M. E., Fox, J. T., Narayanan, S. K., Drouillard, J. S., Renter, D. G., Nagaraja, T. G.
(2008). Effects of feeding wet corn distillers grains with solubles with or without monensin and tylosin on the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of fecal foodborne pathogenic and commensal bacteria in feedlot cattle. J ANIM SCI
86: 1182-1190
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chen, J., Yu, Z., Michel, F. C. Jr., Wittum, T., Morrison, M.
(2007). Development and Application of Real-Time PCR Assays for Quantification of erm Genes Conferring Resistance to Macrolides-Lincosamides-Streptogramin B in Livestock Manure and Manure Management Systems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
73: 4407-4416
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Khachatryan, A. R., Hancock, D. D., Besser, T. E., Call, D. R.
(2006). Antimicrobial Drug Resistance Genes Do Not Convey a Secondary Fitness Advantage to Calf-Adapted Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
72: 443-448
[Abstract]
[Full Text]