AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lisle, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by McFeters, G. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lisle, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by McFeters, G. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lisle, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by McFeters, G. A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2004, p. 5343-5348, Vol. 70, No. 9
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.9.5343-5348.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of Fluorescence Microscopy and Solid-Phase Cytometry Methods for Counting Bacteria in Water

John T. Lisle,1* Martin A. Hamilton,2 Alan R. Willse,2,{dagger} and Gordon A. McFeters3

U.S. Geological Service Center for Coastal and Watershed Studies, St. Petersburg, Florida,1 Center for Biofilm Engineering,2 Department of Microbiology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana3

Received 4 September 2003/ Accepted 17 May 2004

Total direct counts of bacterial abundance are central in assessing the biomass and bacteriological quality of water in ecological and industrial applications. Several factors have been identified that contribute to the variability in bacterial abundance counts when using fluorescent microscopy, the most significant of which is retaining an adequate number of cells per filter to ensure an acceptable level of statistical confidence in the resulting data. Previous studies that have assessed the components of total-direct-count methods that contribute to this variance have attempted to maintain a bacterial cell abundance value per filter of approximately 106 cells filter–1. In this study we have established the lower limit for the number of bacterial cells per filter at which the statistical reliability of the abundance estimate is no longer acceptable. Our results indicate that when the numbers of bacterial cells per filter were progressively reduced below 105, the microscopic methods increasingly overestimated the true bacterial abundance (range, 15.0 to 99.3%). The solid-phase cytometer only slightly overestimated the true bacterial abundances and was more consistent over the same range of bacterial abundances per filter (range, 8.9 to 12.5%). The solid-phase cytometer method for conducting total direct counts of bacteria was less biased and performed significantly better than any of the microscope methods. It was also found that microscopic count data from counting 5 fields on three separate filters were statistically equivalent to data from counting 20 fields on a single filter.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: 600 4th St. South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701. Phone: (727) 803-8747, ext. 3140. Fax: (727) 803-2031. E-mail: jlisle{at}usgs.gov.

{dagger} Present address: Battelle Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2004, p. 5343-5348, Vol. 70, No. 9
0099-2240/04/$08.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/AEM.70.9.5343-5348.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.