This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anesio, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mopper, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anesio, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mopper, K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Anesio, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mopper, K.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2005, p. 6267-6275, Vol. 71, No. 10
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.71.10.6267-6275.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Effect of Humic Substance Photodegradation on Bacterial Growth and Respiration in Lake Water

Alexandre M. Anesio,1 Wilhelm Granéli,2 George R. Aiken,3 David J. Kieber,4 and Kenneth Mopper5*

Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, United Kingdom,1 Department of Ecology/Limnology, Lund University, Ecology Building, S 223 62 Lund, Sweden,2 U.S. Geological Survey, Boulder, Colorado 80303,3 Department of Chemistry, College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Syracuse, New York 13210,4 Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia 235295

Received 21 December 2004/ Accepted 13 May 2005

This study addresses how humic substance (HS) chemical composition and photoreactivity affect bacterial growth, respiration, and growth efficiency (BGE) in lake water. Aqueous solutions of HSs from diverse aquatic environments representing different dissolved organic matter sources (autochthonous and allochthonous) were exposed to artificial solar UV radiation. These solutions were added to lake water passed through a 0.7-µm-pore-size filter (containing grazer-free lake bacteria) followed by dark incubation for 5, 43, and 65 h. For the 5-h incubation, several irradiated HSs inhibited bacterial carbon production (BCP) and this inhibition was highly correlated with H2O2 photoproduction. The H2O2 decayed in the dark, and after 43 h, nearly all irradiated HSs enhanced BCP (average 39% increase relative to nonirradiated controls, standard error = 7.5%, n = 16). UV exposure of HSs also increased bacterial respiration (by ~18%, standard error = 5%, n = 4), but less than BCP, resulting in an average increase in BGE of 32% (standard error = 10%, n = 4). Photoenhancement of BCP did not correlate to HS bulk properties (i.e., elemental and chemical composition). However, when the photoenhancement of BCP was normalized to absorbance, several trends with HS origin and extraction method emerged. Absorbance-normalized hydrophilic acid and humic acid samples showed greater enhancement of BCP than hydrophobic acid and fulvic acid samples. Furthermore, absorbance-normalized autochthonous samples showed ~10-fold greater enhancement of BCP than allochthonous-dominated samples, indicating that the former are more efficient photoproducers of biological substrates.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Old Dominion University, Rm. 110 Alfriend Bldg., 4541 Hampton Blvd., Norfolk, VA 23529. Phone: (757) 683-4094. Fax: (757) 683-4628. E-mail: kmopper{at}odu.edu.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2005, p. 6267-6275, Vol. 71, No. 10
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.71.10.6267-6275.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Ogbebo, F. E., Ochs, C. (2008). Bacterioplankton and phytoplankton production rates compared at different levels of solar ultraviolet radiation and limiting nutrient ratios. J PLANKTON RES 30: 1271-1284 [Abstract] [Full Text]