AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Greenquist, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nagaraja, T. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Greenquist, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nagaraja, T. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Greenquist, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nagaraja, T. G.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2005, p. 6431-6433, Vol. 71, No. 10
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.71.10.6431-6433.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

SHORT REPORT

Comparison of Rectoanal Mucosal Swab Cultures and Fecal Cultures for Determining Prevalence of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Feedlot Cattle

M. A. Greenquist,1 J. S. Drouillard,1 J. M. Sargeant,2,{dagger} B. E. Depenbusch,1 Xiaorong Shi,2 K. F. Lechtenberg,3 and T. G. Nagaraja2*

Department of Animal Sciences and Industry,1 Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506,2 Midwest Veterinary Services, Inc., Oakland, Nebraska 680453

Received 17 February 2005/ Accepted 24 May 2005

We compared fecal samples with samples collected with rectoanal mucosa swabs (RAMS) to determine the prevalence of Escherichia coli O157 in feedlot cattle (n = 747). Escherichia coli O157 was detected in 9.5% of samples collected with RAMS and 4.7% of samples tested by fecal culture. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis of isolates suggested that the strains colonizing the rectoanal junction were the same as those from the feces. Mucosal swab sampling was more sensitive than fecal sampling for determining the prevalence of E. coli O157 in feedlot cattle.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, 305 Coles Hall, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-5606. Phone: (785) 532-1214. Fax: (785) 532-4851. E-mail: tnagaraj{at}vet.ksu.edu.

{dagger} Present address: Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Health Sciences Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, October 2005, p. 6431-6433, Vol. 71, No. 10
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.71.10.6431-6433.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.