This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Islam, F. S. Articles by Lloyd, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Islam, F. S. Articles by Lloyd, J. R. Agricola Articles by Islam, F. S. Articles by Lloyd, J. R.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2005, p. 8642-8648, Vol. 71, No. 12
0099-2240/05/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.71.12.8642-8648.2005
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Interactions between the Fe(III)-Reducing Bacterium Geobacter sulfurreducens and Arsenate, and Capture of the Metalloid by Biogenic Fe(II)

School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences & Williamson Research Centre for Molecular Environmental Science, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom,¹ CCLRC Daresbury Laboratory, Daresbury, Warrington WA4 4AD, United Kingdom²

Received 23 March 2005/ Accepted 31 August 2005

Previous work has shown that microbial communities in As-mobilizing sediments from West Bengal were dominated by Geobacter species. Thus, the potential of Geobacter sulfurreducens to mobilize arsenic via direct enzymatic reduction and indirect mechanisms linked to Fe(III) reduction was analyzed. G. sulfurreducens was unable to conserve energy for growth via the dissimilatory reduction of As(V), although it was able to grow in medium containing fumarate as the terminal electron acceptor in the presence of 500 µM As(V). There was also no evidence of As(III) in culture supernatants, suggesting that resistance to 500 µM As(V) was not mediated by a classical arsenic resistance operon, which would rely on the intracellular reduction of As(V) and the efflux of As(III). When the cells were grown using soluble Fe(III) as an electron acceptor in the presence of As(V), the Fe(II)-bearing mineral vivianite was formed. This was accompanied by the removal of As, predominantly as As(V), from solution. Biogenic siderite (ferrous carbonate) was also able to remove As from solution. When the organism was grown using insoluble ferrihydrite as an electron acceptor, Fe(III) reduction resulted in the formation of magnetite, again accompanied by the nearly quantitative sorption of As(V). These results demonstrate that G. sulfurreducens, a model Fe(III)-reducing bacterium, did not reduce As(V) enzymatically, despite the apparent genetic potential to mediate this transformation. However, the reduction of Fe(III) led to the formation of Fe(II)-bearing phases that are able to capture arsenic species and could act as sinks for arsenic in sediments.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Hudson-Edwards, K. A., Houghton, S., Taylor, K. G. (2008). Efficiences of As uptake from aqueous solution by a natural vivianite material at 4{degrees}C. Mineral Mag 72: 429-431 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lear, G., Song, B., Gault, A. G., Polya, D. A., Lloyd, J. R. (2007). Molecular Analysis of Arsenate-Reducing Bacteria within Cambodian Sediments following Amendment with Acetate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 1041-1048 [Abstract] [Full Text]