AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AEM.01029-06v1
72/11/6914    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Harwood, V. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Harwood, V. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Harwood, V. J.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 2006, p. 6914-6922, Vol. 72, No. 11
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.01029-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Diversity and Distribution of Escherichia coli Genotypes and Antibiotic Resistance Phenotypes in Feces of Humans, Cattle, and Horses{triangledown}

Matthew A. Anderson,{dagger} John E. Whitlock,{ddagger} and Valerie J. Harwood*

Department of Biology, SCA 110, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, Tampa, Florida

Received 3 May 2006/ Accepted 24 August 2006

Escherichia coli is the most completely characterized prokaryotic model organism and one of the dominant indicator organisms for food and water quality testing, yet comparatively little is known about the structure of E. coli populations in their various hosts. The diversities of E. coli populations isolated from the feces of three host species (human, cow, and horse) were compared by two subtyping methods: ribotyping (using HindIII) and antibiotic resistance analysis (ARA). The sampling effort required to obtain a representative sample differed by host species, as E. coli diversity was consistently greatest in horses, followed by cattle, and was lowest in humans. The diversity of antibiotic resistance patterns isolated from individuals was consistently greater than the diversity of ribotypes. E. coli populations in individuals sampled monthly, over a 7- to 8-month period, were highly variable in terms of both ribotypes and ARA phenotypes. In contrast, E. coli populations in cattle and humans were stable over an 8-h period. Following the cessation of antibiotic therapy, the E. coli population in the feces of one human experienced a rapid and substantial shift, from a multiply antibiotic-resistant phenotype associated with a particular ribotype to a relatively antibiotic-susceptible phenotype associated with a different ribotype. The high genetic diversity of E. coli populations, differences in diversity among hosts, and temporal variability all indicate complex population dynamics that influence the usefulness of E. coli as a water quality indicator and its use in microbial source tracking studies.

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biology, SCA 110, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., Tampa, FL 33620. Phone: (813) 974-1524. Fax: (813) 974-3263. E-mail: vharwood{at}chuma1.cas.usf.edu.

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 1 September 2006.

{dagger} Present address: Center of Marine Biotechnology, 701 E. Pratt St., Baltimore, Md.

{ddagger} Present address: Hillsborough Community College, Tampa, Fla.

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 2006, p. 6914-6922, Vol. 72, No. 11
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.01029-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.