This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental material Other Versions of this Article: AEM.01398-06v1 72/11/7286    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Konstantinidis, K. T. Articles by Tiedje, J. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Konstantinidis, K. T. Articles by Tiedje, J. M. Agricola Articles by Konstantinidis, K. T. Articles by Tiedje, J. M.

Toward a More Robust Assessment of Intraspecies Diversity, Using Fewer Genetic Markers ^,

Konstantinos T. Konstantinidis,^*¶ Alban Ramette,^,¶ and James M. Tiedje

Center for Microbial Ecology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan

Received 16 June 2006/ Accepted 5 September 2006

Phylogenetic sequence analysis of single or multiple genes has dominated the study and census of the genetic diversity among closely related bacteria. It remains unclear, however, how the results based on a few genes in the genome correlate with whole-genome-based relatedness and what genes (if any) best reflect whole-genome-level relatedness and hence should be preferentially used to economize on cost and to improve accuracy. We show here that phylogenies of closely related organisms based on the average nucleotide identity (ANI) of their shared genes correspond accurately to phylogenies based on state-of-the-art analysis of their whole-genome sequences. We use ANI to evaluate the phylogenetic robustness of every gene in the genome and show that almost all core genes, regardless of their functions and positions in the genome, offer robust phylogenetic reconstruction among strains that show 80 to 95% ANI (16S rRNA identity, >98.5%). Lack of elapsed time and, to a lesser extent, horizontal transfer and recombination make the selection of genes more critical for applications that target the intraspecies level, i.e., strains that show >95% ANI according to current standards. A much more accurate phylogeny for the Escherichia coli group was obtained based on just three best-performing genes according to our analysis compared to the concatenated alignment of eight genes that are commonly employed for phylogenetic purposes in this group. Our results are reproducible within the Salmonella, Burkholderia, and Shewanella groups and therefore are expected to have general applicability for microevolution studies, including metagenomic surveys.

Published ahead of print on 15 September 2006.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.

^¶ K.T.K. and A.R. contributed equally to this work.

Present address: Celsiusstrasse 1, Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen 28359, Germany.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Martens, M., Dawyndt, P., Coopman, R., Gillis, M., De Vos, P., Willems, A. (2008). Advantages of multilocus sequence analysis for taxonomic studies: a case study using 10 housekeeping genes in the genus Ensifer (including former Sinorhizobium). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 58: 200-214 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• De Bruyne, K., Schillinger, U., Caroline, L., Boehringer, B., Cleenwerck, I., Vancanneyt, M., De Vuyst, L., Franz, C. M. A. P., Vandamme, P. (2007). Leuconostoc holzapfelii sp. nov., isolated from Ethiopian coffee fermentation and assessment of sequence analysis of housekeeping genes for delineation of Leuconostoc species. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57: 2952-2959 [Abstract] [Full Text]