AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AEM.01604-06v1
72/12/7503    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Semrau, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Semrau, J. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S.-W.
Right arrow Articles by Semrau, J. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2006, p. 7503-7509, Vol. 72, No. 12
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.01604-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Mixed Pollutant Degradation by Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b Expressing either Soluble or Particulate Methane Monooxygenase: Can the Tortoise Beat the Hare?{triangledown}

Sung-Woo Lee,1 David R. Keeney,1 Dong-Hee Lim,1 Alan A. Dispirito,2 and Jeremy D. Semrau1*

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, 1351 Beal Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2125,1 Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics, and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 500112

Received 11 July 2006/ Accepted 20 September 2006

Methanotrophs have been widely investigated for in situ bioremediation due to their ubiquity and their ability to degrade halogenated hydrocarbons through the activity of methane monooxygenase (MMO). It has been speculated that cells expressing the soluble form of MMO (sMMO) are more efficient in cleaning up sites polluted with halogenated hydrocarbons due to its broader substrate range and relatively fast degradation rates compared cells expressing the other form of MMO, the particulate MMO (pMMO). To examine this issue, the biodegradation of mixtures of chlorinated solvents, i.e., trichloroethylene (TCE), trans-dichloroethylene (t-DCE), and vinyl chloride (VC), by Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b in the presence of methane using either form of MMO was investigated over longer time frames than those commonly used, i.e., days instead of hours. Growth of M. trichosporium OB3b along with pollutant degradation were monitored and analyzed using a simple comparative model developed from the {Omega} model created for analysis of the competitive binding of oxygen and carbon dioxide by ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase. From these findings, it appears that at concentrations of VC, t-DCE, and TCE greater than 10 µM each, methanotrophs expressing pMMO have a competitive advantage over cells expressing sMMO due to higher growth rates. Despite such an apparent growth advantage, pMMO-expressing cells degraded less of these substrates at these concentrations than sMMO-expressing cells during active growth. If the concentrations were increased to 100 µM, however, not only did pMMO-expressing cells grow faster, they degraded more of these pollutants and did so in a shorter amount of time. These findings suggest that the relative rates of growth substrate and pollutant degradation are important factors in determining which form of MMO should be considered for pollutant degradation.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, 1351 Beal Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2125. Phone: (734) 764-6487. Fax: (734) 763-2275. E-mail: jsemrau{at}umich.edu.

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 29 September 2006.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, December 2006, p. 7503-7509, Vol. 72, No. 12
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.01604-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.