This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Other Versions of this Article: AEM.01412-06v1 72/12/7614    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sanderson, M. W. Articles by Alam, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Sanderson, M. W. Articles by Alam, M. J. Agricola Articles by Sanderson, M. W. Articles by Alam, M. J.

Longitudinal Emergence and Distribution of Escherichia coli O157 Genotypes in a Beef Feedlot

Department of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas,¹ Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada,² Department of Diagnostic Medicine and Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas,³ Department of Entomology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas⁴

Received 19 June 2006/ Accepted 9 October 2006

The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence and longitudinal distribution of Escherichia coli O157 in feedlot cattle and the feedlot environment. Pen floors, water tanks, other cattle in the feedlot, feed, and bird feces were sampled for 2 weeks prior to entry of the study cattle. Twelve pens of study cattle were sampled twice weekly. At each sample time cattle feces, water from tanks in each pen, bunk feed, feed components, bird feces, and houseflies were collected. Bunk feed samples were collected before and after cattle had access to the feed. Overall, 28% of cattle fecal samples, 3.9% of bird fecal samples, 25% of water samples, 3.4% of housefly samples, 1.25% of bunk feed before calf access, and 3.25% of bunk feed samples after cattle had access to the feed were positive for E. coli O157. Genetic analysis of E. coli O157 isolates was done using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). PFGE types identified in sampling of the feedlot prior to calf entry were different than the majority of types identified following calf entry. A single strain type predominated in the samples collected after entry of the cattle. It was first identified 5 days after entry of the first pen of cattle and was subsequently identified in all pens. Data support that the incoming cattle introduced a new strain that became the predominant strain in the feedlot.

Published ahead of print on 20 October 2006.