This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Van der Meulen, R. Articles by De Vuyst, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Van der Meulen, R. Articles by De Vuyst, L. Agricola Articles by Van der Meulen, R. Articles by De Vuyst, L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2006, p. 1006-1012, Vol. 72, No. 2
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.72.2.1006-1012.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

In Vitro Kinetic Analysis of Oligofructose Consumption by Bacteroides and Bifidobacterium spp. Indicates Different Degradation Mechanisms

Research Group of Industrial Microbiology, Fermentation Technology and Downstream Processing (IMDO), Department of Applied Biological Sciences and Engineering, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium

Received 4 August 2005/ Accepted 8 November 2005

The growth of pure cultures of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron LMG 11262 and Bacteroides fragilis LMG 10263 on fructose and oligofructose was examined and compared to that of Bifidobacterium longum BB536 through in vitro laboratory fermentations. Gas chromatography (GC) analysis was used to determine the different fractions of oligofructose and their degradation during the fermentation process. Both B. thetaiotaomicron LMG 11262 and B. fragilis LMG 10263 were able to grow on oligofructose as fast as on fructose, succinic acid being the major metabolite produced by both strains. B. longum BB536 grew slower on oligofructose than on fructose. Acetic acid and lactic acid were the main metabolites produced when fructose was used as the sole energy source. Increased amounts of formic acid and ethanol were produced when oligofructose was used as an energy source at the cost of lactic acid. Detailed kinetic analysis revealed a preferential metabolism of the short oligofructose fractions (e.g., F₂ and F₃) for B. longum BB536. After depletion of the short fractions, the larger oligofructose fractions (e.g., F₄, GF₄, F₅, GF₅, and F₆) were metabolized, too. Both Bacteroides strains did not display such a preferential metabolism and degraded all oligofructose fractions simultaneously, transiently increasing the fructose concentration in the medium. This suggests a different mechanism for oligofructose breakdown between the strain of Bifidobacterium and both strains of Bacteroides, which helps to explain the bifidogenic nature of inulin-type fructans.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Amaretti, A., Bernardi, T., Tamburini, E., Zanoni, S., Lomma, M., Matteuzzi, D., Rossi, M. (2007). Kinetics and Metabolism of Bifidobacterium adolescentis MB 239 Growing on Glucose, Galactose, Lactose, and Galactooligosaccharides. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 3637-3644 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Falony, G., Vlachou, A., Verbrugghe, K., Vuyst, L. D. (2006). Cross-Feeding between Bifidobacterium longum BB536 and Acetate-Converting, Butyrate-Producing Colon Bacteria during Growth on Oligofructose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 7835-7841 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Van der Meulen, R., Adriany, T., Verbrugghe, K., De Vuyst, L. (2006). Kinetic Analysis of Bifidobacterial Metabolism Reveals a Minor Role for Succinic Acid in the Regeneration of NAD+ through Its Growth-Associated Production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 5204-5210 [Abstract] [Full Text]