This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhao, T. Articles by Doyle, M. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhao, T. Articles by Doyle, M. P. Agricola Articles by Zhao, T. Articles by Doyle, M. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2006, p. 3314-3320, Vol. 72, No. 5
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.72.5.3314-3320.2006
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Control of Listeria spp. by Competitive-Exclusion Bacteria in Floor Drains of a Poultry Processing Plant

Center for Food Safety, University of Georgia, Griffin, Georgia 30223,¹ Ecolab Research Center, 655 Lone Oak Drive, St. Paul, Minnesota 55121,² Gold Kist, 244 Perimeter Center Pkwy, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30346³

Received 8 November 2005/ Accepted 27 February 2006

In previous studies workers determined that two lactic acid bacterium isolates, Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis C-1-92 and Enterococcus durans 152 (competitive-exclusion bacteria [CE]), which were originally obtained from biofilms in floor drains, are bactericidal to Listeria monocytogenes or inhibit the growth of L. monocytogenes both in vitro and in biofilms at 4 to 37°C. We evaluated the efficacy of these isolates for reducing Listeria spp. contamination of floor drains of a plant in which fresh poultry is processed. Baseline assays revealed that the mean numbers of Listeria sp. cells in floor drains sampled on six different dates (at approximately biweekly intervals) were 7.5 log₁₀ CFU/100 cm² for drain 8, 4.9 log₁₀ CFU/100 cm² for drain 3, 4.4 log₁₀ CFU/100 cm² for drain 2, 4.1 log₁₀ CFU/100 cm² for drain 4, 3.7 log₁₀ CFU/100 cm² for drain 1, and 3.6 log₁₀ CFU/100 cm² for drain 6. The drains were then treated with 10⁷ CE/ml in an enzyme-foam-based cleaning agent four times in 1 week and twice a week for the following 3 weeks. In samples collected 1 week after CE treatments were applied Listeria sp. cells were not detectable (samples were negative as determined by selective enrichment culture) for drains 4 and 6 (reductions of 4.1 and 3.6 log₁₀ CFU/100 cm², respectively), and the mean numbers of Listeria sp. cells were 3.7 log₁₀ CFU/100 cm² for drain 8 (a reduction of 3.8 log₁₀ CFU/100 cm²), <1.7 log₁₀ CFU/100 cm² for drain 1 (detectable only by selective enrichment culture; a reduction of 3.3 log₁₀ CFU/100 cm²), and 2.6 log₁₀ CFU/100 cm² for drain 3 (a reduction of 2.3 log₁₀ CFU/100 cm²). However, the aerobic plate counts for samples collected from floor drains before, during, and after CE treatment remained approximately the same. The results indicate that application of the two CE can greatly reduce the number of Listeria sp. cells in floor drains at 3 to 26°C in a facility in which fresh poultry is processed.