This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by O'Connell, H. A. Articles by Gilbert, E. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by O'Connell, H. A. Articles by Gilbert, E. S. Agricola Articles by O'Connell, H. A. Articles by Gilbert, E. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2006, p. 5013-5019, Vol. 72, No. 7
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02474-05
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Influences of Biofilm Structure and Antibiotic Resistance Mechanisms on Indirect Pathogenicity in a Model Polymicrobial Biofilm

Heather A. O'Connell, Greg S. Kottkamp, James L. Eppelbaum, Bryan A. Stubblefield, Sarah E. Gilbert, and Eric S. Gilbert^*

Department of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303

Received 19 October 2005/ Accepted 2 May 2006

Indirect pathogenicity (IP), the commensal protection of antibiotic-sensitive pathogens by resistant microorganisms of low intrinsic virulence, can prevent the eradication of polymicrobial infections. The contributions of antibiotic resistance mechanisms and biofilm structure to IP within polymicrobial biofilms were investigated using a model two-member consortium. Escherichia coli ATCC 33456 was transformed with vectors conferring either ampicillin or spectinomycin resistance, creating two distinct populations with different resistance mechanisms. Each strain alone or the consortium was grown as biofilms in flow cells and planktonically in chemostats. Comparisons in survival and activity were made on the basis of MICs and minimum biofilm preventative concentrations, a newly introduced descriptor. In ampicillin-containing medium, commensal interactions were evident during both modes of cultivation, but the sensitive strain experienced a greater benefit in the chemostat, indicating that the biofilm environment limited the commensal interaction between the Amp^r and Spt^r strains. In spectinomycin-containing medium, growth of the sensitive strain in chemostats and biofilms was not aided by the resistant strain. However, green fluorescent protein expression by the sensitive strain was greater in mixed-population biofilms (9% ± 1%) than when the strain was grown alone (2% ± 0%). No comparable benefit was evident during growth in the chemostat, indicating that the biofilm structure contributed to enhanced activity of the sensitive strain.

---

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Dept. of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303. Phone: (404) 463-9917. Fax: (404) 651-2509. E-mail: esgilbert{at}gsu.edu.

---

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2006, p. 5013-5019, Vol. 72, No. 7
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02474-05
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Narisawa, N., Haruta, S., Arai, H., Ishii, M., Igarashi, Y. (2008). Coexistence of Antibiotic-Producing and Antibiotic-Sensitive Bacteria in Biofilms Is Mediated by Resistant Bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 3887-3894 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Merod, R. T., Warren, J. E., McCaslin, H., Wuertz, S. (2007). Toward Automated Analysis of Biofilm Architecture: Bias Caused by Extraneous Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Images. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 4922-4930 [Abstract] [Full Text]