AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rao, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kjelleberg, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rao, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kjelleberg, S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Rao, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kjelleberg, S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2006, p. 5547-5555, Vol. 72, No. 8
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.00449-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Microbial Colonization and Competition on the Marine Alga Ulva australis

Dhana Rao, Jeremy S. Webb,{dagger} and Staffan Kjelleberg*

School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences and Centre for Marine Biofouling and Bio-innovation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia

Received 23 February 2006/ Accepted 10 May 2006

Pseudalteromonas tunicata and Roseobacter gallaeciensis are biofilm-forming marine bacteria that are often found in association with the surface of the green alga Ulva australis. They are thought to benefit the plant host by producing inhibitory compounds that are active against common fouling organisms. We investigated factors that influence the ability of P. tunicata and R. gallaeciensis to attach to and colonize the plant surface and also the competitive interactions that occur between these organisms and other isolates from U. australis during biofilm formation on the plant surface. A surprisingly high number of P. tunicata cells, at least 108 cells ml–1, were required for colonization and establishment of a population of cells that persists on axenic surfaces of U. australis. Factors that enhanced colonization of P. tunicata included inoculation in the dark and pregrowth of inocula in medium containing cellobiose as the sole carbon source (cellulose is a major surface polymer of U. australis). It was also found that P. tunicata requires the presence of a mixed microbial community to colonize effectively. In contrast, R. gallaeciensis effectively colonized the plant surface under all conditions tested. Studies of competitive interactions on the plant surface revealed that P. tunicata was numerically dominant compared with all other bacterial isolates tested (except R. gallaeciensis), and this dominance was linked to production of the antibacterial protein AlpP. Generally, P. tunicata was able to coexist with competing strains, and each strain existed as microcolonies in spatially segregated regions of the plant. R. gallaeciensis was numerically dominant compared with all strains tested and was able to invade and disperse preestablished biofilms. This study highlighted the fact that microbial colonization of U. australis surfaces is a dynamic process and demonstrated the differences in colonization strategies exhibited by the epiphytic bacteria P. tunicata and R. gallaeciensis.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences and Centre for Marine Biofouling and Bio-innovation, Biological Sciences Building, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Phone: 61 (2) 9385 2102. Fax: 61 (2) 9385 1779. E-mail: s.kjelleberg{at}unsw.edu.au.

{dagger} Present address: School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 7PX, United Kingdom.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, August 2006, p. 5547-5555, Vol. 72, No. 8
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.00449-06
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.