This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pang, C. M. Articles by Liu, W.-T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pang, C. M. Articles by Liu, W.-T. Agricola Articles by Pang, C. M. Articles by Liu, W.-T.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2006, p. 5702-5712, Vol. 72, No. 9
0099-2240/06/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02982-05
Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Biological Filtration Limits Carbon Availability and Affects Downstream Biofilm Formation and Community Structure

Department of Civil Engineering, National University of Singapore,¹ Division of Environmental Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore²

Received 17 December 2005/ Accepted 24 May 2006

Carbon removal strategies have gained popularity in the mitigation of biofouling in water reuse processes, but current biofilm-monitoring practices based on organic-carbon concentrations may not provide an accurate representation of the in situ biofilm problem. This study evaluated a submerged microtiter plate assay for direct and rapid monitoring of biofilm formation by subjecting the plates to a continuous flow of either secondary effluent (SE) or biofilter-treated secondary effluent (BF). This method was very robust, based on a high correlation (R² = 0.92) between the biomass (given by the A₆₀₀ in the microtiter plate assay) and the biovolume (determined from independent biofilms developed on glass slides under identical conditions) measurements, and revealed that the biomasses in BF biofilms were consistently lower than those in SE biofilms. The influence of the organic-carbon content on the biofilm community composition and succession was further evaluated using molecular tools. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of 16S rRNA genes revealed a group of pioneer colonizers, possibly represented by Sphingomonadaceae and Caulobacter organisms, to be common in both SE and BF biofilms. However, differences in organic-carbon availabilities in the two water samples eventually led to the selection of distinct biofilm communities. Alphaproteobacterial populations were confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization to be enriched in SE biofilms, while Betaproteobacteria were dominant in BF biofilms. Cloning analyses further demonstrated that microorganisms adapted for survival under low-substrate conditions (e.g., Aquabacterium, Caulobacter, and Legionella) were preferentially selected in the BF biofilm, suggesting that carbon limitation strategies may not achieve adequate biofouling control in the long run.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Wakelin, S. A., Colloff, M. J., Kookana, R. S. (2008). Effect of Wastewater Treatment Plant Effluent on Microbial Function and Community Structure in the Sediment of a Freshwater Stream with Variable Seasonal Flow. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 2659-2668 [Abstract] [Full Text]