This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bhatia, M. Articles by Foght, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bhatia, M. Articles by Foght, J. Agricola Articles by Bhatia, M. Articles by Foght, J.

Distinct Bacterial Communities Exist beneath a High Arctic Polythermal Glacier

Maya Bhatia,^1,2, Martin Sharp,¹ and Julia Foght^2*

Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3,¹ Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada²

Received 13 March 2006/ Accepted 26 June 2006

Bacterial communities reside in basal ice, sediment, and meltwater in the supra-, sub-, and proglacial environments of John Evans Glacier, Nunavut, Canada. We examined whether the subglacial bacterial community shares common members with the pro- and supraglacial communities, and by inference, whether it could be derived from communities in either of these environments (e.g., by ice overriding proglacial sediments or by in-wash of surface meltwaters). Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of bacterial 16S rRNA genes amplified from these environments revealed that the subglacial water, basal ice, and sediment communities were distinct from those detected in supraglacial meltwater and proglacial sediments, with 60 of 142 unique terminal restriction fragments (T-RFs) detected exclusively in subglacial samples and only 8 T-RFs detected in all three environments. Supraglacial waters shared some T-RFs with subglacial water and ice, likely reflecting the seasonal flow of surface meltwater into the subglacial drainage system, whereas supraglacial and proglacial communities shared the fewest T-RFs. Thus, the subglacial community at John Evans Glacier appears to be predominantly autochthonous rather than allochthonous, and it may be adapted to subglacial conditions. Chemical analysis of water and melted ice also revealed differences between the supraglacial and proglacial environments, particularly regarding electrical conductivity and nitrate, sulfate, and dissolved organic carbon concentrations. Whereas the potential exists for common bacterial types to be broadly distributed throughout the glacial system, we have observed distinct bacterial communities in physically and chemically different glacial environments.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.

Present address: Department of Biological Oceanography, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, Woods Hole, MA 02543-1050.