This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow An erratum has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hill, V. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cromeans, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hill, V. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cromeans, T. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hill, V. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cromeans, T. L.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2007, p. 4218-4225, Vol. 73, No. 13
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02713-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Multistate Evaluation of an Ultrafiltration-Based Procedure for Simultaneous Recovery of Enteric Microbes in 100-Liter Tap Water Samples{triangledown}

Vincent R. Hill,1* Amy M. Kahler,1,2 Narayanan Jothikumar,1 Trisha B. Johnson,1,2 Donghyun Hahn,1,2 and Theresa L. Cromeans1,2

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Zoonotic, Vector-Borne, and Enteric Diseases, Division of Parasitic Diseases, Atlanta, Georgia,1 Atlanta Research and Education Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia2

Received 20 November 2006/ Accepted 27 April 2007

Ultrafiltration (UF) is increasingly being recognized as a potentially effective procedure for concentrating and recovering microbes from large volumes of water and treated wastewater. Because of their very small pore sizes, UF membranes are capable of simultaneously concentrating viruses, bacteria, and parasites based on size exclusion. In this study, a UF-based water sampling procedure was used to simultaneously recover representatives of these three microbial classes seeded into 100-liter samples of tap water collected from eight cities covering six hydrologic areas of the United States. The UF-based procedure included hollow-fiber UF as the primary step for concentrating microbes and then used membrane filtration for bacterial culture assays, immunomagnetic separation for parasite recovery and quantification, and centrifugal UF for secondary concentration of viruses. Water samples were tested for nine water quality parameters to investigate whether water quality data correlated with measured recovery efficiencies and molecular detection levels. Average total method recovery efficiencies were 71, 97, 120, 110, and 91% for {phi}X174 bacteriophage, MS2 bacteriophage, Enterococcus faecalis, Clostridium perfringens spores, and Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts, respectively. Real-time PCR and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) for seeded microbes and controls indicated that tap water quality could affect the analytical performance of molecular amplification assays, although no specific water quality parameter was found to correlate with reduced PCR or RT-PCR performance.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Division of Parasitic Diseases, 4770 Buford Highway, Mail Stop F-36, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724. Phone: (770) 488-4432. Fax: (770) 488-4253. E-mail: vhill{at}cdc.gov

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 4 May 2007.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2007, p. 4218-4225, Vol. 73, No. 13
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02713-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Mull, B., Hill, V. R. (2009). Recovery and Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Surface Water, Using Ultrafiltration and Real-Time PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 3593-3597 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mailloux, B. J., Alexandrova, E., Keimowitz, A. R., Wovkulich, K., Freyer, G. A., Herron, M., Stolz, J. F., Kenna, T. C., Pichler, T., Polizzotto, M. L., Dong, H., Bishop, M., Knappett, P. S. K. (2009). Microbial Mineral Weathering for Nutrient Acquisition Releases Arsenic. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 2558-2565 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Hill, V. R., Polaczyk, A. L., Kahler, A. M., Cromeans, T. L., Hahn, D., Amburgey, J. E. (2009). Comparison of Hollow-Fiber Ultrafiltration to the USEPA VIRADEL Technique and USEPA Method 1623. J. Environ. Qual. 38: 822-825 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Leskinen, S. D., Lim, D. V. (2008). Rapid Ultrafiltration Concentration and Biosensor Detection of Enterococci from Large Volumes of Florida Recreational Water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 4792-4798 [Abstract] [Full Text]