This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Other Versions of this Article: AEM.00588-07v1 73/15/4966    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Besemer, K. Articles by Battin, T. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Besemer, K. Articles by Battin, T. J. Agricola Articles by Besemer, K. Articles by Battin, T. J.

Biophysical Controls on Community Succession in Stream Biofilms

Department of Freshwater Ecology, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria,¹ Department of Marine Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria,² Department of Microbial Ecology, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria,³ Wasser Cluster Lunz, Dr. Carl Kupelwieser Promenade 5, A-3293 Lunz am See, Austria⁴

Received 14 March 2007/ Accepted 1 June 2007

Biofilm formation is controlled by an array of coupled physical, chemical, and biotic processes. Despite the ecological relevance of microbial biofilms, their community formation and succession remain poorly understood. We investigated the effect of flow velocity, as the major physical force in stream ecosystems, on biofilm community succession (as continuous shifts in community composition) in microcosms under laminar, intermediate, and turbulent flow. Flow clearly shaped the development of biofilm architecture and community composition, as revealed by microscopic investigation, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis, and sequencing. While biofilm growth patterns were undirected under laminar flow, they were clearly directed into ridges and conspicuous streamers under turbulent flow. A total of 51 biofilm DGGE bands were detected; the average number ranged from 13 to 16. Successional trajectories diverged from an initial community that was common in all flow treatments and increasingly converged as biofilms matured. We suggest that this developmental pattern was primarily driven by algae, which, as "ecosystem engineers," modulate their microenvironment to create similar architectures and flow conditions in all treatments and thereby reduce the physical effect of flow on biofilms. Our results thus suggest a shift from a predominantly physical control to coupled biophysical controls on bacterial community succession in stream biofilms.

Published ahead of print on 8 June 2007.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Lawrence, J. R., Zhu, B., Swerhone, G. D. W., Topp, E., Roy, J., Wassenaar, L. I., Rema, T., Korber, D. R. (2008). Community-Level Assessment of the Effects of the Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobial Chlorhexidine on the Outcome of River Microbial Biofilm Development. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74: 3541-3550 [Abstract] [Full Text]