This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poschetto, L. F.
Right arrow Articles by Marschang, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poschetto, L. F.
Right arrow Articles by Marschang, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Poschetto, L. F.
Right arrow Articles by Marschang, R. E.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2007, p. 5494-5500, Vol. 73, No. 17
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.00482-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of the Sensitivities of Noroviruses and Feline Calicivirus to Chemical Disinfection under Field-Like Conditions{triangledown}

Lorenza Ferrero Poschetto, Anthony Ike, Tibor Papp, Ulrich Mohn,{dagger} Reinhard Böhm, and Rachel E. Marschang*

Hohenheim University, Institut für Umwelt und Tierhygiene, Garbenstrasse 30, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany

Received 2 March 2007/ Accepted 26 June 2007

Noroviruses (NV), in the family Caliciviridae, are an important cause of gastroenteritis in humans worldwide. Measures for prevention and control of NV dissemination are therefore necessary to ensure public safety. The abilities of an organic acid (Venno Vet 1 Super), an aldehyde (Venno FF Super), a halogen compound (sodium hypochlorite solution), and a peroxide (Oxystrong FG) to inactivate feline calicivirus (FCV), a cultivable virus surrogate for NV, were studied. Molecular protocols were then used for the comparative evaluation of disinfectant efficacies against NV and FCV, which were tested by reproducing NV field conditions, using human fecal material as a protein load. Generally, disinfectant efficacy was strongly reduced by the organic impurities (feces) used during tests. All disinfectants, except the aldehyde, were effective on FCV, as measured by cell culture and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), with inactivation levels of ≥99.9%. The glutaraldehyde-based compound failed to adequately inactivate FCV according to RT-PCR results, although the infectivity in cell culture was completely abolished. Similar inactivation levels were achieved with NV, but generally NV appeared more resistant than FCV, and consequently, the suitability of FCV as a model for NV should be considered with caution. In conclusion, according to RT-PCR results, 5% Venno Vet 1 Super, 1% Oxystrong FG, and not less than 2% Venno FF Super, with a contact time of 1 h, and 1% sodium hypochlorite, with 6,000 ppm of free chlorine and a contact time of 15 min, are required for safe disinfection when a calicivirus-related outbreak is suspected.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut für Umwelt und Tierhygiene, Hohenheim University, Garbenstr. 30, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany. Phone: 49 (0)711-459-22468. Fax: 49 (0)711-459-22431. E-mail: rachel.marschang{at}googlemail.com

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 6 July 2007.

{dagger} Present address: Mikrogen GmbH, Forschung ELISA, Floriansbogen 2-4, D-82061 Neuried, Germany.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, September 2007, p. 5494-5500, Vol. 73, No. 17
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.00482-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Pecson, B. M., Martin, L. V., Kohn, T. (2009). Quantitative PCR for Determining the Infectivity of Bacteriophage MS2 upon Inactivation by Heat, UV-B Radiation, and Singlet Oxygen: Advantages and Limitations of an Enzymatic Treatment To Reduce False-Positive Results. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75: 5544-5554 [Abstract] [Full Text]