This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by González-Escalona, N.
Right arrow Articles by DePaola, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by González-Escalona, N.
Right arrow Articles by DePaola, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by González-Escalona, N.
Right arrow Articles by DePaola, A.

 Previous Article

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 2007, p. 7494-7500, Vol. 73, No. 22
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.00738-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of Direct Genome Restriction Enzyme Analysis and Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis for Typing of Vibrio vulnificus and Their Correspondence with Multilocus Sequence Typing Data{triangledown}

Narjol González-Escalona,1,2* Brooke Whitney,1 Lee-Ann Jaykus,1 and Angelo DePaola2

Department of Food Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina,1 FDA Gulf Coast Seafood Laboratory, Dauphin Island, Alabama2

Received 2 April 2007/ Accepted 13 August 2007

We compared the potential of direct genome restriction enzyme analysis (DGREA) and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) for discriminating Vibrio vulnificus isolates from clinical (23) and environmental (17) sources. The genotypes generated by both methodologies were compared to previous multilocus sequence typing (MLST) data. DGREA established clearer relationships among V. vulnificus strains and was more consistent with MLST than with PFGE. DGREA is a very promising tool for epidemiological and ecological studies of V. vulnificus.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: FDA Gulf Coast Seafood Laboratory, 1 Iberville Dr., Dauphin Island, AL 36528. Phone: (251) 690-3074. Fax: (251) 694-4477. E-mail: narjol{at}gmail.com

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 24 August 2007.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, November 2007, p. 7494-7500, Vol. 73, No. 22
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.00738-07
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.