This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Other Versions of this Article: AEM.02105-06v1 73/3/730    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hummel, A. S. Articles by Franz, C. M. A. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hummel, A. S. Articles by Franz, C. M. A. P. Agricola Articles by Hummel, A. S. Articles by Franz, C. M. A. P.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2007, p. 730-739, Vol. 73, No. 3
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02105-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Antibiotic Resistances of Starter and Probiotic Strains of Lactic Acid Bacteria

Federal Research Centre for Nutrition and Food, Institute of Hygiene and Toxicology, Haid-und-Neu-Strasse 9, D-76131 Karlsruhe, Germany,¹ Institute of Food Science and Biotechnology, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstrasse 28, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany²

Received 6 September 2006/ Accepted 15 November 2006

The antibiotic resistances of 45 lactic acid bacteria strains belonging to the genera Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Lactococcus, Pediococcus, and Leuconostoc were investigated. The objective was to determine antibiotic resistances and to verify these at the genetic level, as is currently suggested by the European "qualified presumption of safety" safety evaluation system for industrial starter strains. In addition, we sought to pinpoint possible problems in resistance determinations. Primers were used to PCR amplify genes involved in ß-lactam antibiotic, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and erythromycin resistance. The presence of ribosomal protection protein genes and the ermB gene was also determined by using a gene probe. Generally, the incidences of erythromycin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, or ß-lactam resistances in this study were low (<7%). In contrast, aminoglycoside (gentamicin and streptomycin) and ciprofloxacin resistances were higher than 70%, indicating that these may constitute intrinsic resistances. The genetic basis for ciprofloxacin resistance could not be verified, since no mutations typical of quinolone resistances were detected in the quinolone determining regions of the parC and gyrA genes. Some starter strains showed low-level ampicillin, penicillin, chloramphenicol, and tetracycline resistances, but no known resistance genes could be detected. Although some strains possessed the cat gene, none of these were phenotypically resistant to chloramphenicol. Using reverse transcription-PCR, these cat genes were shown to be silent under both inducing and noninducing conditions. Only Lactobacillus salivarius BFE 7441 possessed an ermB gene, which was encoded on the chromosome and which could not be transferred in filter-mating experiments. This study clearly demonstrates problems encountered with resistance testing, in that the breakpoint values are often inadequately identified, resistance genes may be present but silent, and the genetic basis and associated resistance mechanisms toward some antibiotics are still unknown.

Published ahead of print on 22 November 2006.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Feld, L., Schjorring, S., Hammer, K., Licht, T. R., Danielsen, M., Krogfelt, K., Wilcks, A. (2008). Selective pressure affects transfer and establishment of a Lactobacillus plantarum resistance plasmid in the gastrointestinal environment. J Antimicrob Chemother 61: 845-852 [Abstract] [Full Text]