AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AEM.01170-06v1
73/3/756    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Das, M.
Right arrow Articles by Leff, L. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Das, M.
Right arrow Articles by Leff, L. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Das, M.
Right arrow Articles by Leff, L. G.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2007, p. 756-767, Vol. 73, No. 3
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.01170-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Diversity of Fungi, Bacteria, and Actinomycetes on Leaves Decomposing in a Stream{triangledown}

Mitali Das,1* Todd V. Royer,2 and Laura G. Leff1

Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio 44242,1 School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, 1315 E. 10th St., Bloomington, Indiana 474052

Received 20 May 2006/ Accepted 20 November 2006

Although fungi, bacteria, and specific bacterial taxa, such as the actinomycetes, have been studied extensively in various habitats, few studies have examined them simultaneously, especially on decomposing leaves in streams. In this study, sugar maple and white oak leaves were incubated in a stream in northeastern Ohio for 181 days during which samples were collected at regular intervals. Following DNA extraction, PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) was performed using fungus-, bacterium-, and actinomycete-specific primers. In addition, fungal and bacterial biomass was estimated. Fungal biomass differed on different days but not between leaves of the two species and was always greater than bacterial biomass. There were significant differences in bacterial biomass through time and between leaf types on some days. Generally, on the basis of DGGE, few differences in community structure were found for different leaf types. However, the ribotype richness of fungi was significantly greater than those of the bacteria and actinomycetes, which were similar to each other. Ribotype richness decreased toward the end of the study for each group except bacteria. Lack of differences between the two leaf types suggests that the microorganisms colonizing the leaf biofilm were primarily generalists that could exploit the resources of the leaves of either species equally well. Thus, we conclude that factors, such as the ecological role of the taxa (generalists versus specialists), stage of decay, and time of exposure, appeared to be more important determinants of microbial community structure than leaf quality.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH 44242. Phone: (330) 672-2071. Fax: (330) 672-3713. E-mail: mdas{at}kent.edu.

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 1 December 2006.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, February 2007, p. 756-767, Vol. 73, No. 3
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.01170-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.