AEM
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Other Versions of this Article:
AEM.02718-06v1
73/9/2931    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oppegård, C.
Right arrow Articles by Nissen-Meyer, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oppegård, C.
Right arrow Articles by Nissen-Meyer, J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Oppegård, C.
Right arrow Articles by Nissen-Meyer, J.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2007, p. 2931-2938, Vol. 73, No. 9
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02718-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Analysis of the Two-Peptide Bacteriocins Lactococcin G and Enterocin 1071 by Site-Directed Mutagenesis{triangledown}

Camilla Oppegård, Gunnar Fimland, Lisbeth Thorbæk, and Jon Nissen-Meyer*

Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Oslo, Pb 1041, Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway

Received 21 November 2006/ Accepted 21 February 2007

The two peptides (Lcn-{alpha} and Lcn-ß) of the two-peptide bacteriocin lactococcin G (Lcn) were changed by stepwise site-directed mutagenesis into the corresponding peptides (Ent-{alpha} and Ent-ß) of the two-peptide bacteriocin enterocin 1071 (Ent), and the potencies and specificities of the various hybrid constructs were determined. Both Lcn and, to a lesser extent, Ent were active against all the tested lactococcal strains, but only Ent was active against the tested enterococcal strains. The two bacteriocins thus differed in their relative potencies to various target cells, despite their sequence similarities. The hybrid combination Lcn-{alpha}+Ent-ß had low potency against all strains tested, indicating that these two peptides do not interact optimally. The reciprocal hybrid combination (i.e., Ent-{alpha}+Lcn-ß), in contrast, was highly potent, indicating that these two peptides may form a functional antimicrobial unit. In fact, this hybrid combination (Ent-{alpha}+Lcn-ß) was more potent against lactococcal strains than wild-type Ent was (i.e., Ent-{alpha}+Ent-ß), but it was inactive against enterococcal strains (in contrast to Ent but similar to Lcn). The observation that Ent-{alpha} is more active against lactococci in combination with Lcn-ß and more active against enterococci in combination with Ent-ß suggests that the ß peptide is an important determinant of target cell specificity. Especially the N-terminal residues of the ß peptide seem to be important for specificity, since Ent-{alpha} combined with an Ent-ß variant with Ent-to-Lcn mutations at positions 1 to 4, 7, 9, and 10 was >150-fold less active against enterococcal strains but one to four times more active against lactococcal strains than Ent-{alpha}+Ent-ß. Moreover, Ent-to-Lcn single-residue mutations in the region spanning residues 1 to 7 in Ent-ß had a more detrimental effect on the activity against enterococci than on that against lactococcal strains. Of the single-residue mutations made in the N-terminal region of the {alpha} peptide, the Ent-to-Lcn mutations N8Q and P12R in Ent-{alpha} influenced specificity, as follows: the N8Q mutation had no effect on activity against tested enterococcal strains but increased the activity 2- to 4-fold against the tested lactococcal strains, and the P12R mutation reduced the activity >150-fold and only ~2-fold against enterococcal and lactococcal strains, respectively. Changing residues in the C-terminal half/part of the Lcn peptides (residues 20 to 39 and 25 to 35 in Lcn-{alpha} and Lcn-ß, respectively) to those found in the corresponding Ent peptides did not have a marked effect on the activity, but there was an ~10-fold or greater reduction in the activity upon also introducing Lcn-to-Ent mutations in the mid-region (residues 8 to 19 and 9 to 24 in Lcn-{alpha} and Lcn-ß, respectively). Interestingly, the Lcn-to-Ent F19L+G20A mutation in an Lcn-Ent-ß hybrid peptide was more detrimental when the altered peptide was combined with Lcn-{alpha} (>10-fold reduction) than when it was combined with Ent-{alpha} (~2-fold reduction), suggesting that residues 19 and 20 (which are part of a GXXXG motif) in the ß peptide may be involved in a specific interaction with the cognate {alpha} peptide. It is also noteworthy that the K2P and A7P mutations in Lcn-ß reduced the activity only ~2-fold, suggesting that the first seven residues in the ß peptides do not form an {alpha}-helix.


* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Oslo, Post Box 1041, Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway. Phone: 47 22 85 73 51. Fax: 47 22 85 44 43. E-mail: jon.nissen-meyer{at}imbv.uio.no

{triangledown} Published ahead of print on 2 March 2007.


Applied and Environmental Microbiology, May 2007, p. 2931-2938, Vol. 73, No. 9
0099-2240/07/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02718-06
Copyright © 2007, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. Eukaryot. Cell All ASM Journals

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.