This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental material Other Versions of this Article: AEM.01338-07v1 74/1/172    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mounier, J. Articles by Irlinger, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mounier, J. Articles by Irlinger, F. Agricola Articles by Mounier, J. Articles by Irlinger, F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2008, p. 172-181, Vol. 74, No. 1
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.01338-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Microbial Interactions within a Cheese Microbial Community ^,

UMR782 Génie et Microbiologie des Procédés Alimentaires, INRA, AgroParisTech, 78850 Thiverval Grignon, France,¹ Ecologie des Populations et Communautés, AgroParisTech, 75000 Paris, France²

Received 15 June 2007/ Accepted 25 October 2007

The interactions that occur during the ripening of smear cheeses are not well understood. Yeast-yeast interactions and yeast-bacterium interactions were investigated within a microbial community composed of three yeasts and six bacteria found in cheese. The growth dynamics of this community was precisely described during the ripening of a model cheese, and the Lotka-Volterra model was used to evaluate species interactions. Subsequently, the effects on ecosystem functioning of yeast omissions in the microbial community were evaluated. It was found both in the Lotka-Volterra model and in the omission study that negative interactions occurred between yeasts. Yarrowia lipolytica inhibited mycelial expansion of Geotrichum candidum, whereas Y. lipolytica and G. candidum inhibited Debaryomyces hansenii cell viability during the stationary phase. However, the mechanisms involved in these interactions remain unclear. It was also shown that yeast-bacterium interactions played a significant role in the establishment of this multispecies ecosystem on the cheese surface. Yeasts were key species in bacterial development, but their influences on the bacteria differed. It appeared that the growth of Arthrobacter arilaitensis or Hafnia alvei relied less on a specific yeast function because these species dominated the bacterial flora, regardless of which yeasts were present in the ecosystem. For other bacteria, such as Leucobacter sp. or Brevibacterium aurantiacum, growth relied on a specific yeast, i.e., G. candidum. Furthermore, B. aurantiacum, Corynebacterium casei, and Staphylococcus xylosus showed reduced colonization capacities in comparison with the other bacteria in this model cheese. Bacterium-bacterium interactions could not be clearly identified.

Published ahead of print on 2 November 2007.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.