This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental material Other Versions of this Article: AEM.02068-07v1 74/1/245    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Friedl, M. A. Articles by Druzhinina, I. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Friedl, M. A. Articles by Druzhinina, I. S. Agricola Articles by Friedl, M. A. Articles by Druzhinina, I. S.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, January 2008, p. 245-250, Vol. 74, No. 1
0099-2240/08/$08.00+0     doi:10.1128/AEM.02068-07
Copyright © 2008, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Carbon Source Dependence and Photostimulation of Conidiation in Hypocrea atroviridis ^,

Research Area of Gene Technology and Applied Biochemistry, Institute of Chemical Engineering, Vienna University of Technology, Getreidemarkt 9-1665, A-1060 Vienna, Austria

Received 11 September 2007/ Accepted 22 October 2007

Hypocrea atroviridis is frequently used as a photomorphogenetic model due to its ability to conidiate upon exposure to light. Light is thereby believed to be the primary trigger for spore formation. In contrast, we show here that conidiation is primarily carbon source dependent and that illumination plays a catalytic role; of a total of 95 tested carbon sources, only a small set of carbohydrates, polyols, and sugar acids allowed conidiation in darkness, and on most of them, conidiation was significantly more strongly expressed in light. In addition, there are also a number of carbon sources on which H. atroviridis conidiates in darkness, but light does not further stimulate the process. Yet on another small set of carbon sources (L-sorbitol, D-fucose, D- and L-arabinose, and erythritol), H. atroviridis shows better sporulation in darkness than in light. No sporulation was observed on organic acids and amino acids. Mutants with deletions in the two blue-light receptor proteins BLR-1 and BLR-2 generally showed weaker conidiation on a smaller number of carbon sources than did the parental strain, yet they clearly sporulated on 15 and 27 of the 95 carbon sources tested, respectively. Of the carbon sources supporting sporulation, only 11 supported the conidiation of both mutants, suggesting that the BLR-1 and BLR-2 receptors are variously involved in the carbon source-dependent regulation of spore formation. The addition of cyclic AMP, which has been reported to lead to conidiation in darkness, both positively and negatively affected sporulation and resulted in different effects in the parental strain and the two blr mutants. Our data show that the carbon source is the prime determinant for conidiation and that it influences the organism's regulation of conidiation by means of BLR-1 and BLR-2 and their cross talk with cyclic AMP.

Published ahead of print on 2 November 2007.

Supplemental material for this article may be found at http://aem.asm.org/.